Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John ONeill

(89 posts)
4. Air as reactor working fluid
Wed Jan 4, 2023, 12:14 AM
Jan 2023

Really like the Kairos concept - it should avoid the radioactive dust problem that the German HTTR had, due to the lubrication and buoyancy from the salt. Per Petersen says the stresses on the fuel pebbles are so low, it's like them relaxing in one of those sensory deprivation tanks that rich people allegedly pay to spend time in.
Wouldn't running air through a reactor core make nitrous oxide, from the heat, and carbon 14, from neutron reactions on the nitrogen? Otherwise, I'd thought autonomous nuclear drones, with minimal shielding, could stay aloft for a year or so, and tow passenger planes a safe distance behind them. That would cut out most of the greenhouse gases from aviation. Hooking on and unhooking would be automated, too. The aircraft would only need to carry enough fuel to get to cruising altitude, get back down, make a backup landing field in case of a mishap, and run the auxilliary power unit for house loads.
Considering the fallibility of pilots shown by 9-11, the German who took his passengers into the Alps, and probably the Malaysian Air jet that disappeared somewhere in the Indian Ocean, that might be a safer as well as cleaner option, though I'd probably have trouble convincing most people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Chinese modular high temp...»Reply #4