Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: I have a question about nuclear weapons. Anyone here know much about them? [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)54. You should stop making dumb assumptions about other posters.
Or would you like me to start claiming you want us all shivering in the dark?
I'm pro-reality. There's enough bullshit on both sides of nuke/no-nuke.
However, as Fukushima is actually teaching us, right at this very moment, a nuclear power plant shorn of electricity and replenished water, is a dangerous thing.
No. That is the case for a first-generation plant like Fukushima. Which we already knew. Newer designs could theoretically deal with it, but these designs have not been built due to costs, lawsuits and lack of governmental approvals.
Whether the radiation comes from spent fuel rods, or those in the reactor vessel, matters little to those getting dosed.
Unless, of course, your goal was to prevent such a catastrophe. Because the difference tells you where you actually have to change what you're doing to avoid disaster.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have a question about nuclear weapons. Anyone here know much about them? [View all]
GreenPartyVoter
May 2012
OP
As happened in the last billion or so years I would think things would re-evolve until
Lint Head
May 2012
#1
From what I have read, the missiles will just sit there. It's the reactors that might pose a problem
Ian David
May 2012
#2
Well, it's reassuring to know we won't be able to blow things up any more. But yeah, the ability
GreenPartyVoter
May 2012
#5
A similar question might be: Who tends to the nuclear powerplant meltdowns when the grid falls?
villager
May 2012
#3
Yes, exactly. We have all kinds of infrastructure that is far from benign. It will certainly
GreenPartyVoter
May 2012
#4
That's what happened at Fukushima - fuel rods keep generating heat even with control rods inserted
bananas
May 2012
#24
A year later and they STILL have to pump cooling water into the reactors and spent fuel pools. nt
bananas
May 2012
#26
Some recent news stories about how necessary cooling water is after the plant is "shut down"
bananas
May 2012
#28
National Geographic has a less apologetic view of nuclear power, addressing the stored fuel rods
villager
May 2012
#20
Exactly. Indeed, in these "aftermath" specials, they seem to think natural forces would "scrub away"
villager
May 2012
#22
Yes, but even if plants survive safely their fuel will not. I realize all is hunky-dory in nuke land
villager
May 2012
#50
The reactor continues generating decay heat which can destroy the containment in hours
bananas
May 2012
#25
So you think "internet-message-board etiquette" is established by what you like.
kristopher
May 2012
#44
A year later and they STILL have to pump cooling water into the reactors and spent fuel pools.
bananas
May 2012
#27
Um, no. I was sticking to the OP (remember, it's about *nukes* in the aftermath of humankind)
villager
May 2012
#60
There are some cornucopians among 'em, but I also find many of them to be quite realistic
villager
May 2012
#72
I was around when the USSR could have annhilated us, and it turned out to be the sun hitting
GreenPartyVoter
May 2012
#12
All I know is that even in Arizona, we can't have them in our house, car or on our person.
OffWithTheirHeads
May 2012
#9
My kids and I loved the "Life After People" series! I don't remember them discussing the
GreenPartyVoter
May 2012
#19
The earth has gone through catastrophes much worse than a few bombs going off
GliderGuider
May 2012
#32
Actually a good perspective, GG. Though one wonders if the recent methane releases means
villager
May 2012
#65
If the human race disappears, there is no one around to care what happens next.
FarCenter
May 2012
#86
I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree to disagree until I see this model.
AtheistCrusader
May 2012
#101