Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(13,084 posts)
9. Nobody is advocating boiling the water to solve the radiation or any other pollutant problem
Sun Feb 19, 2023, 09:33 PM
Feb 2023

with Indian Point's water, at least not from the OP's excerpt. I didn't read all the linked articles, so maybe I missed something. The only thing in the OP excerpt that talks about boiling water is:

"Those advocating nuclear boondoggles to boil water won't be around to worry about the waste."

That's apparently caribbean's comment. The usual meme about how boiling water with nuclear energy is way overdoing the relatively "simple" task of boiling water blah blah as some present it. (One boils water to generate steam to spin the turbine-generators that produce the electricity).

Trouble is the anywhere-near-economic large-scale alternative ways of boiling water are fossil-fueled.  

Sorry if I'm not understanding what your comment refers to

How stupid do they think people are? Boiling water will not eliminate contaminants like heavy metals, salts, and chemicals but ONLY bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. A 7th grader would know this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Dumping 1M gallons of rad...»Reply #9