Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,677 posts)
18. Oh... you wanted GOOD sources?
Sat May 26, 2012, 05:43 AM
May 2012

You'll have to stay away from the one in the OP then.

For the record, their "reporting" on this one was lousy. They failed to note that the reported cesium figure for Fukushima was the iodine equivelent, not the actual amount of cesium. Chernobyl's was the actual amount of cesium.

That leaves Chernobyl at about 8-10 times as high as all four damaged reactors combined.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2012/05/telephone-game-for-nth-time-how.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»For those who care: Curre...»Reply #18