Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: The world is waking up from a long stupid slumber... [View all]NNadir
(38,397 posts)28. Um, nuclear energy has the highest energy to mass ratio of any form of energy, by far.
If someone is really, really, really, really concerned about mining, they might do well to access the following scientific paper:
Closing the Infrastructure Gap for Decarbonization: The Case for an Integrated Mineral Supply Agreement Saleem H. Ali, Sophia Kalantzakos, Roderick Eggert, Roland Gauss, Constantine Karayannopoulos, Julie Klinger, Xiaoyu Pu, Kristin Vekasi, and Robert K. Perrons Environmental Science & Technology 2022 56 (22), 15280-15289
Here's figure 3 from the paper:

The caption:
Figure 3. Materials needed for different forms of power generation. Figure based on data from U.S. Department of Energy Quadrennial Energy Review 2015.
It might also be worthwhile to take a look at this article, not in a scientific journal, but illustrative nonetheless.
Data insight: the cost of a wind turbine has increased by 38% in two years
The reason for this price increase is appalling mass intensity.
I have argued that the uranium already mined, never mind the thorium mined and dumped in lanthanide mine tailings, is sufficient to power the entire world for over 150 years if converted to plutonium using nuclear reactors designed now to last 80 years.
Anyone who has a problem with mining should definitely have a problem with so called "renewable energy," the mass intensity, as the above graphic shows, makes its very name a cruel joke.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
do you think anyone would be bothering if not for everyone asking those questions, tho?
mopinko
Apr 2023
#1
The fossil fuel industry dumps toxic and deadly waste into the atmosphere continuously.
NNadir
Apr 2023
#3
Um, nuclear energy has the highest energy to mass ratio of any form of energy, by far.
NNadir
Apr 2023
#28
The solar industry depends on access to dangerous fossil fuels. It's dirty and unsustainable.
NNadir
Apr 2023
#5
What DQIIIIIIII totally ignores is that the cost of electricity isn't a constant...
Finishline42
May 2023
#32
And it takes an enormous amount of coal-fired electricity to enrich uranium for reactor fuel
jpak
Apr 2023
#12
"The lifetime of solar cells is generally reported to be between 20 to 25 years"
Caribbeans
Apr 2023
#22
It might be useful to open a scientific paper rather than continuously producing marketing documents
NNadir
Apr 2023
#24
It would be interesting to learn if there are any antinuke idiots who can demonstrate that...
NNadir
Apr 2023
#17