Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(27,509 posts)

28. Garwin called them "deliberately misleading"

Mon May 28, 2012, 01:18 AM

May 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Current Fukishima headlines #2: [View all] dixiegrrrrl May 2012 OP

There's no contradiction. kristopher May 2012 #1

WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW May 2012 #5

Wrong way Pam strikes again... kristopher May 2012 #8

thank you, Kristopher. dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #6

dupe: delete dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #7

Flat wrong. FBaggins May 2012 #10

I don't see why the "pyramid" would ever be "rebuilt" caraher May 2012 #13

These go to eleven OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #14

It is refreshing to have a well reasoned position presented kristopher May 2012 #15

Amen to that last part caraher May 2012 #27

Nope. An active imagination doesn't mean you have a clue. FBaggins May 2012 #21

Further evidence is found on page 29 FBaggins May 2012 #22

You're a hoot, Baggins. kristopher May 2012 #23

Were you going to adress any of the evidence AT ALL? FBaggins May 2012 #24

Major problems’ with radiation testing for children dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #2

TEPCO's post-mortem shows No. 2 reactor main source of radiation dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #3

Yesterday the WHO said radiation levels were low in Japan WTF? Frosty1 May 2012 #4

Probably a lot of the radiation has gone due to half-life decay NickB79 May 2012 #9

What do you think about that report? Reliable? dixiegrrrrl May 2012 #16

Yeah… I'm going to trust the UN OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #17

Accepting this statement by the WHO... kristopher May 2012 #18

I don't think the WHO is colluding with the nuclear power industry OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #19

It isn't a matter of collusion. kristopher May 2012 #20

Your implication is that the WHO cannot be trusted OKIsItJustMe May 2012 #25

I didn't imply anything. kristopher May 2012 #26

Garwin called them "deliberately misleading" bananas May 2012 #28