"How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer.

[Nihil]

119. If you are going to use quotes, at least get the words right ...

> What is your objection to splitting EE into two groups?

E&E is a bigger concern than one or two personalities.

As I stated earlier, if *you* wish to set up a Kristopher-worshipping group in order
to provide a "safe haven", go ahead and do so - just don't claim that it is somehow
the "Environment & Energy" group.


> Obviously there are a number of us who are fed up with
> the nuclear faction's unremitting attempts at message control here ...

Smear ignored.


> ... and 75% of Dems are AGAINST spending any more money on nuclear power.

Non-sequitor - attempt at distraction ignored.


> Why the hell should those who are expressing the mainstream views of the progressive
> movement have to put up with a Rove style political and PR campaign by the nuclear
> supporters here?

Distraction + smear ignored.

Actually, on reconsidering, no, I'm not going to ignore yet another petty vindictive smear
from you against anyone who dares to disagree (or who has dared to do so in the past
as you obviously hold grudges for a l-o-n-g time).

If you view a post as being part of "a Rove style political and PR campaign" then alert on it.

If you view a poster as being a supporter of "a Rove style political and PR campaign" then
alert on them with a ToS flag for being a disruptor.

If you just wish to scream & shout about nonexistent persecution, victimisation or other
pretended behaviour from people who have been bending over backwards to try to
accomodate your hatred of disagreement then be prepared for *your* hateful rants to
be alerted upon in turn.