Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Elevated Radium Activity in a Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Aquifer [View all]NNadir
(37,968 posts)The nuclear industry is over 70 years old, and has been attacked by lots of morons who couldn't care less about climate change, air pollution deaths, and the lives saved by nuclear energy.
Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power (Pushker A. Kharecha* and James E. Hansen Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (9), pp 48894895)
How about it? After 70 years of nuclear paranoia, how many people were killed by it?
As many as will die today from air pollution? (Where, exactly, does nuclear energy deaths appear in this comprehensive publication?)
Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 19902019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (Lancet Volume 396, Issue 10258, 1723 October 2020, Pages 1223-1249). This study is a huge undertaking and the list of authors from around the world is rather long. These studies are always open sourced; and I invite people who want to carry on about Fukushima to open it and search the word "radiation." It appears once. Radon, a side product brought to the surface by fracking while we all wait for the grand so called "renewable energy" nirvana that did not come, is not here and won't come, appears however: Household radon, from the decay of natural uranium, which has been cycling through the environment ever since oxygen appeared in the Earth's atmosphere.
Here is what it says about air pollution deaths in the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Survey, if one is too busy to open it oneself because one is too busy carrying on about Fukushima:
Obsessive ignorance is not neutral. It kills people.