Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thatdemguy

(620 posts)
11. More than a loss of energy at each stage, its a loss over all
Mon Jul 10, 2023, 11:21 AM
Jul 2023

You lose some around around 20% over all meaning to get 100 unit of energy from hydrogen you use 120 unit of energy to get the hydrogen.

If your using nat gas feed stock to get the hydrogen you might as well burn the nat gas. You get like 3 times the energy and the same co2 output.

If your breaking down water you use 5 times the energy for the amount of hydrogen you get. The only green way to get hydrogen is solar power, and you much better off using the solar to just make electricity for use, as you get twice the amount of energy.

Hydrogen is not dead as an energy storage means, but there is very little legit reasons for it. One of the few is being able to use generated electrical power that is not being used. Aka all the power plants running in stand by for when wind and solar does not met the demand.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Researchers discover safe...»Reply #11