Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)

1. The money back guarantee is neat and all

Reply to FBaggins (Original post)

Thu May 31, 2012, 10:43 AM

May 2012

but there isn't a whole lot of need for this type of power supply, outside maybe some remote locations, like towns in Alaska, where diesel has to be shipped in for electrical power.

But they probably can't afford it, either.

So who is going to buy a bunch of 100-300mw nuclear reactors? Given the ancillary costs around fuel, security, etc.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We’re looking at a fleet of SMRs. We have no interest in building a few and walking away" [View all] FBaggins May 2012 OP

The money back guarantee is neat and all AtheistCrusader May 2012 #1

I think you may have overemphasized the "small" part. FBaggins May 2012 #2

I didn't say 'small'. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #3

You said "outside of remote locations" FBaggins May 2012 #4

Hawaii is not too large. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #5

Those "long term costs" really aren't all that large. FBaggins May 2012 #7

The nuclear industry has a long history of egregiously underestimating costs. bananas May 2012 #10

Security costs for nuclear require an MIC. Diesel and solar don't. Hardly a small cost. WriteWrong May 2012 #8

Were you under the impression that the military would go away if we didn't have nuclear power? FBaggins May 2012 #9

Would? Doubt it. Could? Yes, definitely. Should? Yes, definitely. WriteWrong Jun 2012 #12

(14) 100-MW SMRs/year by 2030 kristopher May 2012 #6

And the first one in 2022 - yeah, that'll stop global warming! bananas May 2012 #11

They won't find 100 American communities that will accept one of these bombs Kolesar Jun 2012 #13