Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)

3. I didn't say 'small'.

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #2)

Thu May 31, 2012, 11:05 AM

May 2012

I said 100-300mw, and specified ancillary costs that are not present for many other generating sources.

There are security costs around any isotope source that are not present for a wind turbine, for instance. Lock a door, put a fence around it, you can leave wind turbines strewn all over the damn place.

Not so with a reactor.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We’re looking at a fleet of SMRs. We have no interest in building a few and walking away" [View all] FBaggins May 2012 OP

The money back guarantee is neat and all AtheistCrusader May 2012 #1

I think you may have overemphasized the "small" part. FBaggins May 2012 #2

I didn't say 'small'. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #3

You said "outside of remote locations" FBaggins May 2012 #4

Hawaii is not too large. AtheistCrusader May 2012 #5

Those "long term costs" really aren't all that large. FBaggins May 2012 #7

The nuclear industry has a long history of egregiously underestimating costs. bananas May 2012 #10

Security costs for nuclear require an MIC. Diesel and solar don't. Hardly a small cost. WriteWrong May 2012 #8

Were you under the impression that the military would go away if we didn't have nuclear power? FBaggins May 2012 #9

Would? Doubt it. Could? Yes, definitely. Should? Yes, definitely. WriteWrong Jun 2012 #12

(14) 100-MW SMRs/year by 2030 kristopher May 2012 #6

And the first one in 2022 - yeah, that'll stop global warming! bananas May 2012 #11

They won't find 100 American communities that will accept one of these bombs Kolesar Jun 2012 #13