Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,677 posts)
7. Those "long term costs" really aren't all that large.
Thu May 31, 2012, 12:11 PM
May 2012

We haven't done an adequate job of planning for that long term storage, but it isn't a big expense relative to the rest of the lifetime cost of a reactor.

everything is past the scrubbers, it's gone. No more cost.

Really?

Let's ignore global climate change costs (huge), and just look at the ash that remains from coal plants.

http://www.ecodaddyo.com/coal-ash-ponds-new-mexico

"No more cost" indeed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"We’re looking at a ...»Reply #7