Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Blues Heron

(8,793 posts)

4. Wouldnt this cut air pollution though?

Reply to NNadir (Reply #3)

Tue Aug 1, 2023, 11:09 PM

Aug 2023

If it cuts down on bunker oil particulates in exchange for CO2 at the reformation plant, maybe that is not such a bad trade especially for residents of port areas, as well as the ships crew.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yanmar Announces 300kW Marine Hydrogen Fuel Cell System [View all] Caribbeans Aug 2023 OP

It's so good to see... Think. Again. Aug 2023 #1

Somewhat Related: Toyota introduces a hydrogen rubbish truck in Japan Caribbeans Aug 2023 #2

They should just burn the dirty fossil fuels from which hydrogen is made at a thermodynamic loss. NNadir Aug 2023 #3

Wouldnt this cut air pollution though? Blues Heron Aug 2023 #4

No. It will make air pollution even worse, and drive climate change faster. NNadir Aug 2023 #5

but it would eliminate toxic air pollution in favor of nontoxic CO2, bad as that is Blues Heron Aug 2023 #6

Moving pollution and making more pollution in doing so is not clean; it's filthy. NNadir Aug 2023 #7

It's not toxic like particulates or cancer causing substances in bunker fuel exhaust Blues Heron Aug 2023 #8

I personally do not value bourgeois cruise people over people who will be killed near chemical... NNadir Aug 2023 #9

its for work boats and cargo ships not just cruise ships Blues Heron Aug 2023 #10