Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
13. It's going to be nasty.
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 03:30 AM
Jun 2012

We're going to ultimately resort to geoengineering, and I doubt very seriously that we're going to be able to get it just right. The ice caps will melt, that's just a foregone conclusion. We'll be having to deal with the issue from three prongs.

1) Massive 300k+ persons / year migrations out of sea zones that will be affected (you will have to start "early" to move all the people affected, many many people will push back and every year they don't move, there will be thousands more you have to move in the same time frame, eventually they'll get the picture, after enough floods).

2) Highly risky geoengineering which could actually turn the planet into a snowball earth or bring on an ice age if it is not done properly. A perpetually tinted yellow sky. The will of nation states to participate together since the sky / atmosphere is shared by all.

3) All the while you'll have to be doing these things with highly dwindling fossil resources which will impact the growth of society further, and which will shut down globalization in short order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Warming gas levels hit 't...»Reply #13