Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(4,982 posts)

4. Because it would interfere with gas & oil profits. . .

Sat Jun 2, 2012, 04:04 AM

Jun 2012

... if it was publicized. So, it isn't. Because nothing else in this world is more important than corprat profits - including the world itself.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greenhouse gas levels pass symbolic 400ppm CO2 milestone [View all] Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 OP

Glad we couldn't have kids... WCGreen Jun 2012 #1

This is the second article I've read on this since yesterday... Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #2

Even Rachel Maddow? Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #5

Because it would interfere with gas & oil profits. . . ProfessionalLeftist Jun 2012 #4

Well, there would be no profits if there was no world. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #6

Yea that's the point these " geniuses" seem to miss. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Jun 2012 #7

No one in power cares about long-term issues NickB79 Jun 2012 #15

And our previous president and his secretary of the interior Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #16

It has been and it is. kristopher Jun 2012 #8

Thanks for the reassuring information. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #10

K & R dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #9

Maybe this was posted elsewhere. Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #11

It was posted later on Thursday in LBN dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #12

Terrific! I'll check it out! Rhiannon12866 Jun 2012 #13