Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

OKIsItJustMe

(21,734 posts)

7. Well... it's not magic.

Reply to Think. Again. (Reply #3)

Fri Aug 11, 2023, 07:37 PM

Aug 2023

If there's a coal plant in the area (or some other source of CO₂ that CO₂ is just as likely to be absorbed as the “legacy” CO₂ (perhaps more, since the concentration will probably be higher.)

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden-Harris Administration Announces Up To $1.2 Billion For Nation's First Direct Air Capture Demo... [View all] OKIsItJustMe Aug 2023 OP

Dang, what if this works flamingdem Aug 2023 #1

So, if you check the release, there are two pilot project here OKIsItJustMe Aug 2023 #2

Thank you flamingdem Aug 2023 #5

Bravo Joe! Think. Again. Aug 2023 #3

Well... it's not magic. OKIsItJustMe Aug 2023 #7

And that would be GREAT!... Think. Again. Aug 2023 #8

You could magnify its impact by making oil companies stop burning or releasing methane. Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #4

Well, yes, naturally, cutting emissions is vitally important it's just not sufficient OKIsItJustMe Aug 2023 #6

yes we do.. Think. Again. Aug 2023 #9

I am finding it hard to find-- Lulu KC Aug 2023 #10

The most cost-effective approach orthoclad Aug 2023 #11

A little background BlueIn_W_Pa Aug 2023 #12