Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

12. If you didn't have straw man arguments...

Reply to FBaggins (Reply #11)

Mon Jun 4, 2012, 01:12 PM

Jun 2012

The building is heavily damaged. I've never said it was falling down or leaning heavily.

This deformation is new, and in the light of the accompanying geological report, it is also troubling.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Xpost Good Reads: New "bulge" in wall of Fukushima reactor building 4 worries public [View all] kristopher Jun 2012 OP

Du rec. Nt xchrom Jun 2012 #1

k/r FourScore Jun 2012 #2

KnR alittlelark Jun 2012 #3

This is a long ways from over madokie Jun 2012 #4

Looks like I was wrong FBaggins Jun 2012 #5

You're nearly always wrong. kristopher Jun 2012 #6

Just about any time I give you the benefit of the doubt, yes. FBaggins Jun 2012 #7

Are you seriously trying to say a NEW deformation of a building ... kristopher Jun 2012 #8

A "new" deformation? FBaggins Jun 2012 #9

Only because it is. kristopher Jun 2012 #10

Let's be clear just to document that nonsense for posterity. FBaggins Jun 2012 #11

If you didn't have straw man arguments... kristopher Jun 2012 #12

Nice dodge. FBaggins Jun 2012 #13