Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

13. Nice dodge.

Reply to kristopher (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 4, 2012, 01:27 PM

Jun 2012

On what basis do you claim that the bulge is new? A couple UFO sites? A blogger?

Do you think you can eyeball a 3cm bulge in a multi-story building with a damaged facade?

I've never said it was falling down or leaning heavily.

Plenty of people here have and I don't remember you ever refuting it. Do you now agree that they were wrong all along?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Xpost Good Reads: New "bulge" in wall of Fukushima reactor building 4 worries public [View all] kristopher Jun 2012 OP

Du rec. Nt xchrom Jun 2012 #1

k/r FourScore Jun 2012 #2

KnR alittlelark Jun 2012 #3

This is a long ways from over madokie Jun 2012 #4

Looks like I was wrong FBaggins Jun 2012 #5

You're nearly always wrong. kristopher Jun 2012 #6

Just about any time I give you the benefit of the doubt, yes. FBaggins Jun 2012 #7

Are you seriously trying to say a NEW deformation of a building ... kristopher Jun 2012 #8

A "new" deformation? FBaggins Jun 2012 #9

Only because it is. kristopher Jun 2012 #10

Let's be clear just to document that nonsense for posterity. FBaggins Jun 2012 #11

If you didn't have straw man arguments... kristopher Jun 2012 #12

Nice dodge. FBaggins Jun 2012 #13