Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

caraher

(6,356 posts)
18. These are not dealbreakers
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 12:49 PM
Jun 2012

You just need more sophisticated air handling than airliners use. We keep people in space for months on end; air quality is a minor technical issue. Depending on the use of the tunnel and pumping speed one could even imagine venting gases out the rear if there were a need to do so.

Concerning acceleration, why assume unbelted passengers? On an airliner you are belted for substantial periods of time that do not exceed those required for accelerating and decelerating one of these trains. Airliners might be a good benchmark for realistic readily-tolerated accelerations - they're well short of 1 g, but I'd say closer to 1/4 than 1/10 of a g.

I'm not obsessed with the hypervelocity claims and 1-hour travel times; I do think there could be substantial benefits to this approach for shorter trips and slower speeds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Vacuum trains: a high-spe...»Reply #18