Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(22,048 posts)
6. Mind you, this is just one scenario. (i.e. adding sufates to the upper atmosphere.)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 10:56 AM
Jun 2012

Other schemes (like terra preta/biochar) would not produce the same effects.

http://www.egu.eu/home/geoengineering-could-disrupt-rainfall-patterns.html

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Press Release: Geoengineering could disrupt rainfall patterns[/font]
[font size=4]A geoengineering solution to climate change could lead to significant rainfall reduction in Europe and North America, a team of European scientists concludes. The researchers studied how models of the Earth in a warm, CO2-rich world respond to an artificial reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching the planet’s surface. The study is published today in Earth System Dynamics, an Open Access journal of the European Geosciences Union (EGU).[/font]

[font size=3]Tackling climate change by reducing the solar radiation reaching our planet using climate engineering, known also as geoengineering, could result in undesirable effects for the Earth and humankind. In particular, the work by the team of German, Norwegian, French, and UK scientists shows that disruption of global and regional rainfall patterns is likely in a geoengineered climate.

“Climate engineering cannot be seen as a substitute for a policy pathway of mitigating climate change through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,” they conclude in the paper.



Under the scenario studied, rainfall strongly decreases – by about 15 percent (some 100 millimetres of rain per year) of preindustrial precipitation values – in large areas of North America and northern Eurasia. Over central South America, all models show a decrease in rainfall that reaches more than 20 percent in parts of the Amazon region. Other tropical regions see similar changes, both negative and positive. Overall, global rainfall is reduced by about five percent on average in all four models studied.

“The impacts of these changes are yet to be addressed, but the main message is that the climate produced by geoengineering is different to any earlier climate even if the global mean temperature of an earlier climate might be reproduced,” says Schmidt.

…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-63-2012

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Geoengineering experiment cancelled amid patent row joshcryer Jun 2012 #1
A charter for geoengineering joshcryer Jun 2012 #2
... and I've been there with you ... Nihil Jun 2012 #14
+1 drokhole Jun 2012 #15
From 7 years ago dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #3
Nobody actually needs to SEE the stars. That's what we have satellites for... GliderGuider Jun 2012 #4
I'm not sure resort is the right word The2ndWheel Jun 2012 #5
Mind you, this is just one scenario. (i.e. adding sufates to the upper atmosphere.) OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #6
Other schemes are not cheap. Global dimming happens for free* when you pollute. joshcryer Jun 2012 #18
Even this scheme actually involves some expense OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #19
I didn't say it was free, I said it was cheaper than the alternatives. joshcryer Jun 2012 #23
"Global dimming happens for free* when you pollute." OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #24
Did you not see the asterisk? joshcryer Jun 2012 #25
Sure did! OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #28
Jevon's Paradox would be a useful parable here. IDemo Jun 2012 #7
I am tired of “Jevons’ Paradox” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #9
Then we're disagreed on the issue IDemo Jun 2012 #10
In the first place, this is a misapplication of “Jervons Paradox” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #11
You must have missed the word "parable" in my post IDemo Jun 2012 #12
Jervons was wrong OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #13
Never mind aesthetics caraher Jun 2012 #8
What Are People Really Talking About When They Talk About "Geo-Engineering"? drokhole Jun 2012 #16
Aerosols are the cheapest way to do it, and thus is how it is going to be done. joshcryer Jun 2012 #17
These approaches are also not effective OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #20
Reducing incoming sunlight does not help with ocean acidification, drm604 Jun 2012 #21
Correct! OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #22
Nothing to see here... joshcryer Jun 2012 #26
It's not that there’s nothing to see here OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #27
Scientists warn geoengineering may disrupt rainfall joshcryer Jul 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Geoengineering would turn...»Reply #6