Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(42,144 posts)
2. It looks like it is, a little. They don't burn the coal completely, they partially burn it to make coke for steelmaking.
Tue Jan 2, 2024, 12:04 AM
Jan 2024

It's the coke flue gas that is actually converted to ethanol. Since the coke (purer form of carbon than raw coal) is going to be produced anyway, and flue gas carries most of the sulfur and nitrogen impurities that lead to pollution (aside from the GHG effect of CO2), this is basically making a useful chemical feedstock from what had been exhaust (though I think that is normally burned in furnaces, so it doesn't totally go to waste -- just makes lots of CO2 and sulfur/nitrogen emissions).

Granted "better than coking coal" is a low bar, it's still a little step up ...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»China tests world's large...»Reply #2