Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
7. The key here is catalysis.
Fri Jan 12, 2024, 08:52 PM
Jan 2024

Catalyzed reactions take less energy than uncatalyzed.

We'd have to do an energy budget to compare the energy cost of the two catalyzed reactions in this process with the energy released by burning carbon sources - or with the energy captured by having that carbon in the atmosphere. The article says that use of catalysts reduces the temperature needed for the reaction from 1000C to 400C. That's still a lot of heat.

“It’s very unrealistic for large-scale CO2 mitigation [referring to the 1000C process],” Chen said. “In contrast, we found a process that can occur at about 400 degrees Celsius, which is a much more practical, industrially achievable temperature.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Catalytic Combo Converts ...»Reply #7