Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
6. Yes, I would say that is nuclear industry FUD.
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jun 2012

Germany had been planning the shut downs for 11 years. Since the coal/nuclear lobby there believed just before Fukushima that they had thwarted those long standing plans to shut down the nuclear fleet, there have, indeed, been consequences that didn't need to accrue. So yes, the claim that planning to ensure German energy security was in any way deficient in a manner that could be compared to Japan is absurd industry spin.

Did planning for the shutdown of San Onofre commence in 2000?

I know you are desperate to discredit what Germany is doing, but when you try to analogize Germany with San Onofre, you are trying to compare apples with oranges. The more accurate situation would to compare it to any unplanned, long-term shutdown - such as Japan.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unless of course you turn it off on purpose. FBaggins Jun 2012 #1
You're claiming this is a voluntary shutdown? kristopher Jun 2012 #2
Of course not FBaggins Jun 2012 #3
You couldn't be more wrong. kristopher Jun 2012 #4
Still dodging. FBaggins Jun 2012 #5
Yes, I would say that is nuclear industry FUD. kristopher Jun 2012 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The intermittent nature o...»Reply #6