Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Polywell update from May - sounds like things are going really well! [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,943 posts)15. What is your definition of prototype, which you feel they have not met?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell
Lets see, it is now 2012. So, Nebel said three years ago, they hoped to have net energy production within six years.
I believe the prototype, WB-8 was completed (am I wrong?)
[font face=Serif][font size=3]
In May 2009, Richard Nebel was interviewed in a popular science/futurism blog. He stated: "We are hoping to have a net energy production product within six years. It could take longer, but this definitely won't be a 50 year development project. |...| So if the concept works we could have a commercial plant operating as early as 2020."[/font][/font]
In May 2009, Richard Nebel was interviewed in a popular science/futurism blog. He stated: "We are hoping to have a net energy production product within six years. It could take longer, but this definitely won't be a 50 year development project. |...| So if the concept works we could have a commercial plant operating as early as 2020."[/font][/font]
Lets see, it is now 2012. So, Nebel said three years ago, they hoped to have net energy production within six years.
[font face=Serif][font size=3]In September 2009, the FBO (Federal Business Opportunities web site) confirmed the award of Recovery Act funding under Navy contract in the amount of $7.86M to construct and test a WB-8, the next Polywell prototype. This device will have an eightfold increase in magnetic field strength compared to prior WB series devices, with the expectation of higher performance. Of particular importance within the Navy contract is the option for an additional $4.46M for "...based on the results of WB8 testing, and the availability of government funds the contractor shall develop a WB machine (WB8.1) which incorporates the knowledge and improvements gained in WB8. It is expected that higher ion drive capabilities will be added, and that a PB11 reaction will be demonstrated".
[/font][/font]
[/font][/font]
I believe the prototype, WB-8 was completed (am I wrong?)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Going to Mars might be nice, although humans seem not to be really well suited for space travel
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2012
#8
“mass coronial ejections” are actually a relatively minor concern in my book
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2012
#30
Remember, Bussard recommended a much more aggressive development schedule (for $200 million)
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2012
#38
Polywell Updates (4/11/2014) --> 13 year old does Fusion. Was On Letterman Show.
The Polywell Guy
Apr 2014
#57
“Polywell is basically in the same category as thorium. — Mostly pointless dreaming.”
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2012
#14
No, I'm say stop tooting our own horns until you got something to toot about.
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#35
I don't share Roger's view of "fission is bad." There are lots of waste products from fission.
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#48
I'm aware of the aneutronic aspects of pB11. That doesn't change the fact that...
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#47
I think it can be done, I'm simply saying that if someone wanted to make a nuke...
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#52
Polywell Updates (4/11/2014). 13 year old does Fusion. Was on Letterman.
The Polywell Guy
Apr 2014
#58