Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
34. So, you propose to do nothing then? Is that it?
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 05:34 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 06:51 PM - Edit history (2)

Expecting our technological society to (voluntarily) shut down isn’t a realistic scenario.

I also feel that your demands of wind are not realistic. I sincerely doubt that wind turbines will replace all of our coal plants, and so long as net energy usage keeps increasing globally, we can expect carbon emissions to keep increasing as well (but not as fast as they would have, were it not for the use of wind and solar.)

You’ve fallen into the same trap as our friend Mr. Jevons, who concluded that since energy use did not go down as a response to more efficient steam engines, that somehow the steam engines were not successful in saving energy. (He neglected to take into account the fact that increasing energy usage was a long-standing trend, which more efficient engines could not reverse on their own, although they might lessen the rate of increase.)

To understand the impact of wind power, you shouldn’t look at whether total emissions have gone up or down, but look at emissions as a function of energy use. (i.e. How much CO[font size="1"]2[/font] is being released per watt used?)



We need to do some work on our grid to take better advantage of wind:
http://www.anl.gov/articles/grid-realities-cancel-out-some-wind-power-s-carbon-savings

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Grid realities cancel out some of wind power’s carbon savings[/font]

By Louise Lerner • May 29, 2012

[font size=3]ARGONNE, Ill. — Wind energy lowers carbon emissions, but adding turbines to the current grid system does not eliminate emissions proportionally, according to a report by researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory.

To test how wind energy affects carbon dioxide (CO[font size="1"]2[/font]) emissions, Argonne scientists modeled the Illinois electric grid—power plants, production and demand—and tested how more wind power would affect the system. They found that adjusting for wind power adds inefficiencies that cancel out some of the CO[font size="1"]2[/font] reduction.

It’s actually the older technology in the background that hampers wind. Because the wind doesn’t blow all the time, operators occasionally have to turn on extra fossil-burning plants to keep up with demand.



The study, “Systems-Wide Emissions Implications of Increased Wind Power Penetration”, a collaboration between researchers at Argonne and summer interns Valentino (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) and Viviana Valenzuela (Georgia Institute of Technology), was published in Environmental Science & Technology. Other Argonne co-authors are Zhi Zhou and Guenter Conzelmann.

…[/font][/font]


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks! OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #1
I know, it's really exciting. bananas Jun 2012 #2
Its not like Polywell hasnt had its bumps in the road FogerRox Jun 2012 #4
Going to Mars might be nice, although humans seem not to be really well suited for space travel OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #8
Building the next generation of industrial infrastructure FogerRox Jun 2012 #24
“mass coronial ejections” are actually a relatively minor concern in my book OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #30
Ah yes, I forgot, demineralization of bones FogerRox Jun 2012 #39
More than just deminieralization of bones OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #44
Its probably worth it to build FogerRox Jun 2012 #45
Space Studies Institute wants to launch a gravity lab into LEO near the ISS bananas Jun 2012 #50
2001 aside, I am skeptical of centrifuges OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #51
State of the current contract FogerRox Jun 2012 #3
Thanks for that timeline. nt bananas Jun 2012 #9
They claimed a working prototype would be around 5 years from 4 years ago. joshcryer Jun 2012 #12
What is your definition of prototype, which you feel they have not met? OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #15
OK, hit me up in 3 years. joshcryer Jun 2012 #17
Well the New E-guns, followed by more DD runs and diagnostics FogerRox Jun 2012 #26
Couple of points FogerRox Jun 2012 #20
Which brings us to the definitions of words OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #25
Yes definitions FogerRox Jun 2012 #31
I think this is where I got the 5 year figure: joshcryer Jun 2012 #33
Remember, Bussard recommended a much more aggressive development schedule (for $200 million) OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #38
I'm familiar with that video. joshcryer Jun 2012 #40
Polywell Updates (4/11/2014) --> 13 year old does Fusion. Was On Letterman Show. The Polywell Guy Apr 2014 #57
Are they going poly well? phantom power Jun 2012 #5
Polywell is basically in the same category as thorium. joshcryer Jun 2012 #6
I believe you are fundamentally incorrect. OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #7
I believe you have a fundamental comprehension issue. joshcryer Jun 2012 #11
“Polywell is basically in the same category as thorium. — Mostly pointless dreaming.” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #14
It is in the mostly pointless dreaming category. joshcryer Jun 2012 #16
Interesting… OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #18
DoD / MIC spend lots of money on a lot of projects that don't succeed. joshcryer Jun 2012 #19
Uh huh… OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #21
Uh huh... joshcryer Jun 2012 #23
Honestly, you need to examine your logic OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #37
That's my reason for dropping out of the "Polywell scene." joshcryer Jun 2012 #41
Whats up Josh? FogerRox Jun 2012 #22
I came to a realization when reading some of the detractors' comments. joshcryer Jun 2012 #27
For what it's worth OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #28
Recession is currently having more an impact on emissions than wind. joshcryer Jun 2012 #29
So, you propose to do nothing then? Is that it? OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #34
No, I'm say stop tooting our own horns until you got something to toot about. joshcryer Jun 2012 #35
The reason I belatedly posted the update in E/E ... bananas Jun 2012 #43
I don't share Roger's view of "fission is bad." There are lots of waste products from fission. joshcryer Jun 2012 #48
"Expecting our technological society to shut down isn’t a realistic scenario" NickB79 Jun 2012 #36
What I'm saying, ultimately, is that if I were to post a "thorium update"... joshcryer Jun 2012 #42
You really ought to say what you mean then OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #46
I'm aware of the aneutronic aspects of pB11. That doesn't change the fact that... joshcryer Jun 2012 #47
“…no clue of how to make an alpha absorber…” OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #49
I think it can be done, I'm simply saying that if someone wanted to make a nuke... joshcryer Jun 2012 #52
Yup, off the shelf tech needs to roll out FogerRox Jun 2012 #32
New Jersey nuclear fusion firm ratchets up Iranian collaboration kristopher Jun 2012 #10
Eric Lerner? FogerRox Jun 2012 #13
The Polywell Blog, got some traffic from here The Polywell Guy Aug 2013 #53
Welcome to DU! bananas Aug 2013 #54
I'll have to extend a warm welcome to DU to you madokie Aug 2013 #55
Polywell Updates (2-3-2014) The Polywell Guy Feb 2014 #56
Polywell Updates (4/11/2014). 13 year old does Fusion. Was on Letterman. The Polywell Guy Apr 2014 #58
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Polywell update from May ...»Reply #34