Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
8. It's worth looking at when you get the time
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jun 2012

On an hourly basis across an entire year (8760 hours) they looked at electricity demand in all regions of the US and compared it to available renewable resources with a target of seeing if those resources could provide 80% of the required electricity - the remaining 20% was residual fossil/nuclear from today's grid.

It is stating the obvious to most of us, but the key finding was confirmation that indeed, renewables are "more than adequate to supply 80% of total U.S. electricity generation in 2050 while meeting electricity demand on an hourly basis in every region of the country".

The key term is "more than adequate" since we know that several of these resources are of sufficient quantity unto themselves to provide 100% of our power many times over.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»NREL says 80% of US elect...»Reply #8