Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,093 posts)
12. I refer you to post #9 in this thread. As for climate gas reductions in China, attributing them to solar...
Thu Mar 26, 2026, 12:26 PM
Mar 26

...in a country that is building nuclear plants at a rate not seen since the 20th century in the United States and in France, is inherently dishonest.

In this century, China has brought 61 nuclear reactors on line, and has 38 under construction. Their reactors can run day or night, on windy days and on still days.

Of course, one is free to claim something about "narratives" and bias, but it might be wise to consider whether this is a pot and kettle case.

I have already made clear that nuclear energy, in China, and everywhere else on Earth for that matter, has a far higher capacity utilization than solar and wind junk.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

James Hansen et al: Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and... OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #1
Yes, but Fukushima was worse, right? NNadir Mar 26 #2
False Dichotomy OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #3
Bullshit. There is a CAUSE of the climate collapse, and it is the use of fossil fuels. NNadir Mar 26 #4
Yes OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #5
Bullshit again. Nuclear energy is the ONLY form of power, worldwide, that exceeds the capacity utilization of coal... NNadir Mar 26 #6
As usual, you suggest that anyone who disagrees with you in the slightest degree is ignorant and/or stupid OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #7
As usual I note that while I respect and utilize the IEA tables giving historical data, I have zero respect for... NNadir Mar 26 #9
Something you won't bother to read OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #8
I read all day long, but I am very clear that the word "Watt" is a unit of PEAK power, not energy. If one... NNadir Mar 26 #10
The sort of evidence you ignore because it doesn't support your narrative OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #11
I refer you to post #9 in this thread. As for climate gas reductions in China, attributing them to solar... NNadir Mar 26 #12
A scientist looks at evidence for and against their theories OKIsItJustMe Mar 26 #13
Again, bullshit: Pot and Kettle. I have merely pointed out that climate gas reductions in China can be attributed... NNadir Mar 26 #14
From the data at the link in post #14, one can calculate that the capacity utilization of nuclear plants in China NNadir Mar 26 #15
Um, it would seem - not all that surprising - that "I'm not an antinuke" antinukes around here know nothing at all... NNadir Mar 27 #18
China is adding renewable capacity MUCH faster than it is adding Nuclear. thought crime Mar 26 #16
The "nukes-only" folk don't understand the word "transition". thought crime Mar 26 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Extreme global climate ou...»Reply #12