Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MaineNative

(100 posts)
8. Per Various Sources
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 09:39 AM
Friday

1. Federal Action and Immediate Status
Moratorium Overturned: The U.S. Senate passed a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution, previously passed by the House, to overturn the Biden-era 20-year moratorium on mining in the Superior National Forest, which protected over 225,000 acres.
Presidential Approval: President Donald Trump is expected to sign this resolution into law, allowing Twin Metals to reapply for federal permits and potentially reinstate the leases cancelled in 2022.
Procedural Controversy: Legal experts and opponents are questioning the use of the CRA, arguing that a land withdrawal is not a "rule" that should be subjected to this procedural move years later. Reuters

2. State Authority and Potential Lease Revocation
DNR Lease Power: The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) retains authority over state-owned land and permits.
Lease Cancellation Pressures: Environmental groups are pressuring the DNR to cancel one of Twin Metals' state mineral leases. The 1990 lease agreement reportedly allows for cancellation in 2026 if the company has not started mining or paid the state $100,000 in royalties within 35 years.
Permitting Hurdles: Twin Metals must start from "square one" on state environmental reviews. The state can still refuse to issue necessary permits (potentially up to 18 federal and state permits) if the project fails to meet strict environmental standards. friends-bwca.org

3. Future Legal and Political Battles
Lawsuits Expected: Opponents, including environmental groups and tribal nations, are preparing federal lawsuits challenging the legality of the CRA move.

Future Legislation: While the current CRA action prevents a future president from enacting a "substantially similar" ban, future Congresses could potentially pass new legislation protecting the watershed.
Public and Political Pressure: Public opinion remains heavily divided, and the project is likely to remain a contentious issue in upcoming elections, with opponents continuing to raise concerns about the risk of water pollution in the Boundary Waters.

In summary, while a major federal roadblock was removed in April 2026, the project is not guaranteed to proceed, as it faces steep state regulatory, financial, and legal hurdles. The Timberjay

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trump Order Strips Protec...»Reply #8