Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(22,397 posts)
4. New York is looking to deploy technology like SMR's (Small Modular Reactors) in the near future
Mon Jun 22, 2026, 07:01 PM
14 hrs ago

I don’t think it’s corruption. I think it’s sensible. Most experts agree, some sort of “dispatchable” source is necessary to support variable renewable sources (like wind, PV solar.) Small Modular Reactors are a reasonable solution (although I would greatly prefer nuclear fusion.)

Even the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (renamed the National Laboratory of the Rockies by a certain orange faced buffoon) in their plan for a clean grid by 2035 (now purged from their servers, but archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250106220818/https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/81644.pdf ) called for deploying new nuclear reactors, especially in what they called the “Constrained Scenario.”

The Constrained scenario limits both renewable energy and transmission deployment, resulting in higher costs. The higher costs of renewables makes new nuclear capacity more cost-competitive, and in this scenario, the model builds about 200 GW of new nuclear capacity between 2030 and 2035. This scenario would require about 40 GW/year of new installation, or about four times the maximum historical rate in the United States.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Elementl Power Developing...»Reply #4