Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
43. 2150 is what Hubbert called the date for "Peak Coal" 2025 according in Energy Watch
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jul 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_coal

Hubbert's paper on Fossil fuel production, Go to page 21 to see his estimate on coal production, This paper is dated 1956

http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf

In that 1956 Paper, Hubbert made two observations, first oil production in the lower 48 states would peak about 1970 as would Natural Gas production that was tied in with oil production.

Since the 1970s (and due to the Natural Gas crisis of the 1970s), natural gas production has separated from oil production. This has lead to increase Natural gas production. This was a concept Hubbert seems to have missed, but so did most people, my Father talked about his relative of the 1930s, "Coal Oil Johnny" who operated in Pennsylvania. "Coal Oil Johnny" would drill for oil, but find Natural Gas. Oil would have made his rich in the 1930s, Natural gas just paid for the next drilling site. That is how Natural Gas and Oil were related prior to the 1970s, Natural Gas was a by product of oil drilling. No one drilled for Natural Gas.

Thus a huge error on the Part of Hubbert as to Natural Gas, for Natural Gas can exist below 20,000 feet. At 20,000 feet the natural heat of the earth converts oil to Natural Gas. We could drill to 20,000 by 1937, thus Hubbert estimate as to oil was spot on. His estimate on Natural Gas was off.

Unlike Natural Gas, coal reserves were well known by 1956, thus Hubbert's estimate of 2150 for peak coal is still a good estimate. One problem with 2150 is that Coal is looking to be a replacement for oil, something Hubbert did not really count on (Hubbert relied on Nuclear power to replace oil in the 1956 paper).

Thus Energy Watch gives an estimate of 2025 in 2007
http://www.energywatchgroup.org/fileadmin/global/pdf/EWG_Report_Coal_10-07-2007ms.pdf

The USA, being the second largest producer, already passed peak production of high quality coal in 1990 in the Appalachian and the Illinois basin. Production of subbituminous coal in Wyoming more than compensated for this decline in terms of volume and – according to its stated reserves – this trend can continue for another 10 to 15 years. However, due to the lower energy content of subbituminous coal, US coal production in terms of energy already peaked 5 years ago – it is unclear whether this trend can be reversed. Also specific productivity per miner has been declining since about 2000.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is why rooftop solar in Germany doesn't mean anything in the big picture. GliderGuider Jun 2012 #1
That isn't true - "Cheap Coal Is Dead. Long Live Renewable Age (Part 1)" kristopher Jun 2012 #2
I'll believe it when I see it. GliderGuider Jun 2012 #3
What's the lifespan on a new coal-fired plant? NickB79 Jun 2012 #4
Renewables Make German Power Market Design Defunct, Utility Says kristopher Jun 2012 #5
That's an epic piece of greenwashing if I've ever seen it. joshcryer Jul 2012 #10
India's largest energy company drops coal and that's greenwashing? kristopher Jul 2012 #14
Largest private generating company; 2.5% of the total generating capacity muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #16
Do you think the economics of coal are better for the other companies? kristopher Jul 2012 #17
They may well be better for public generators muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #18
That information argues against your proposition kristopher Jul 2012 #19
My 'proposition' is that Tata is 2.5% of the market muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #20
I understood your meaning - the conclusion isn't correct. kristopher Jul 2012 #22
The shortage is because India isn't exploiting their own reserves to their maximum. joshcryer Jul 2012 #25
The shortage isn't "artificial" kristopher Jul 2012 #26
What year do you expect coal to be gone as a global energy source? XemaSab Jul 2012 #28
2150 is what Hubbert called the date for "Peak Coal" 2025 according in Energy Watch happyslug Jul 2012 #43
Then why did the Indian government take away that companies rights to mine? joshcryer Jul 2012 #32
India is not reducing their coal consumption. joshcryer Jul 2012 #24
"India grapples with coal shortages" kristopher Jul 2012 #27
India has close to 270 billion tons of coal. joshcryer Jul 2012 #33
How much of a dent do your solar panels make XemaSab Jul 2012 #12
In the meantime, I'm still sitting here waiting for more than a few token rooftop solar panels... Systematic Chaos Jul 2012 #13
Well then we better hope the US rescinds the "punitive" tariffs against Chinese PV companies. David__77 Jul 2012 #29
I must disagree OKIsItJustMe Jun 2012 #8
And those solar costs are still vastly higher is generally affordable. TheWraith Jul 2012 #15
“Germany is burning MORE coal now than before, not less.” OKIsItJustMe Jul 2012 #38
Did you know that Germany is getting rid of coal subsidies? - "Saarland coal exit" kristopher Jul 2012 #39
Yes, I had read that they were OKIsItJustMe Jul 2012 #40
And the administration is planning 6 huge coal ports pscot Jun 2012 #6
We're actually using less coal thanks to wind and efficiency. joshcryer Jul 2012 #11
We're also using less coal because our economy is in the crapper XemaSab Jul 2012 #21
That's true enough. joshcryer Jul 2012 #23
Peak coal hit the US in 1998, in terms of energy, 2002 in terms of volume happyslug Jul 2012 #44
Yeah, I'm quite familiar with that link. joshcryer Jul 2012 #45
Not sure why "advanced" is being used as a synonymn for "increased" here. eppur_se_muova Jun 2012 #7
Yep RobertEarl Jun 2012 #9
The growth comes mainly from China's increased use. David__77 Jul 2012 #30
The renewable portfolio includes a lot more than solar. kristopher Jul 2012 #31
That's good... David__77 Jul 2012 #34
India is building out its coal as well. Hundreds of new plants proposed or being built. joshcryer Jul 2012 #35
The non-OECD countries have DOUBLED their coal consumption since 2002 GliderGuider Jul 2012 #36
Non-OECD countries are the problem children of the global energy family GliderGuider Jul 2012 #37
Yikes. Look at how gas is far far outpacing renewables. joshcryer Jul 2012 #42
Coal is still extremely cheap and in non-OECD states a coal plant can be built quick. joshcryer Jul 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»global coal consumption h...»Reply #43