Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

phantom power

(25,966 posts) Wed Jul 11, 2012, 01:30 PM Jul 2012

I have a comment on these temperature record pie charts: [View all]

Last edited Wed Jul 11, 2012, 06:16 PM - Edit history (1)

Over and above the obvious conclusion that the temperature distribution is not stationary, the thing that struck me was that not only have we broken 10 times more highs than lows (so far) in 2012, but it's happening the year after we just broke a giant number of record highs. It's quite a run we're having.

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/7/11/121535/620

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have a comment on these temperature record pie charts: [View all] phantom power Jul 2012 OP

you ain't seen nothin yet limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #1

We should start flamingdem Jul 2012 #11

It's Gore's fault Doctor_J Jul 2012 #2

And he is making $Millions$ doing it. rgbecker Jul 2012 #3

Jesus, that really drives the point home, doesn't it? nt GliderGuider Jul 2012 #4

Shamelessly shared on FB nt GliderGuider Jul 2012 #5

I just realized I forgot link, which I corrected in the OP phantom power Jul 2012 #9

I'm not convinced that in the absence of Man, the Highs and lows would be equaling out Demeter Jul 2012 #6

it certainly assumes the distribution is symmetric, or nearly so. phantom power Jul 2012 #7

Pretty cool - it's kind of like the clock on the cover of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . . hatrack Jul 2012 #8

If those charts were clocks pscot Jul 2012 #10

The catastrophic decline of the arctic ice cap is causing... joshcryer Jul 2012 #12

As you say, it would be easy to overlook the cumulative effect ... Nihil Jul 2012 #13

Or something along the lines of XemaSab Jul 2012 #14

I think one of the articles linked from the one in the OP has a clearer picture caraher Jul 2012 #15

Wouldn't one also expect the trend to go closer to 1:1 each decade? XemaSab Jul 2012 #16

I think that's right caraher Jul 2012 #17