Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
16. Wouldn't one also expect the trend to go closer to 1:1 each decade?
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 04:49 PM
Jul 2012

If you have 10 years of data (or fish, or kids, or pecan trees, or whatever) the odds of the 11th one being either higher or lower than the other 10 is pretty good. It's not a big data set.

If you have 100 years of data (or fish, or kids, or pecan trees, or whatever), then the odds of the 101st thing breaking the records is a lot smaller.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»I have a comment on these...»Reply #16