Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: NYT - Japanese Government Says Decommissioning Fukushima Reactors Will Take 40 Years [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)1. Notice there is no mention of cost in the NYT piece...
That's because:
TEPCO omits total cost of decommissioning nuclear reactors from work schedule
Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), the operator of the crippled Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant, did not specify the cost of decommissioning the plant's reactors in its work schedule announced Dec. 21 -- apparently to obscure the possibility of the utility becoming insolvent and no longer viable as a company.
The utility, however, will inevitably come under pressure to process and release accounting information on the snowballing costs of decommissioning the No. 1-4 reactors at the plant, which was crippled in the aftermath of the March 11 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami.
The government is considering injecting taxpayers' money into the utility and nationalizing it to turn it into an entity dedicated to providing compensation for the nuclear crisis. The government is also poised to launch a full-scale debate on the fate of TEPCO's management with major lenders to the utility.
It is difficult to predict how much it will cost to decommission the four reactors -- a task expected to take up to 40 years and be fraught with difficulties. A government-appointed third-party panel estimated in October that it will cost 1.151 trillion yen to decommission the troubled reactors. TEPCO, meanwhile, has decided to set aside some 940 billion yen for decommissioning.
The utility...
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20111222p2a00m0na019000c.html
Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), the operator of the crippled Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant, did not specify the cost of decommissioning the plant's reactors in its work schedule announced Dec. 21 -- apparently to obscure the possibility of the utility becoming insolvent and no longer viable as a company.
The utility, however, will inevitably come under pressure to process and release accounting information on the snowballing costs of decommissioning the No. 1-4 reactors at the plant, which was crippled in the aftermath of the March 11 Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami.
The government is considering injecting taxpayers' money into the utility and nationalizing it to turn it into an entity dedicated to providing compensation for the nuclear crisis. The government is also poised to launch a full-scale debate on the fate of TEPCO's management with major lenders to the utility.
It is difficult to predict how much it will cost to decommission the four reactors -- a task expected to take up to 40 years and be fraught with difficulties. A government-appointed third-party panel estimated in October that it will cost 1.151 trillion yen to decommission the troubled reactors. TEPCO, meanwhile, has decided to set aside some 940 billion yen for decommissioning.
The utility...
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20111222p2a00m0na019000c.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT - Japanese Government Says Decommissioning Fukushima Reactors Will Take 40 Years [View all]
hatrack
Dec 2011
OP
Since the public is going to have to pay eventually, TEPCO's shareholder value should disappear now
Kolesar
Dec 2011
#4
Well, this is the model you said you prefer, a for-profit company with government oversight
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#15
I think you'd eventually have a raft of problems just as bad as you now see.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#17
And energy shouldn't be in the hands of governments that amass power over people.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#20