Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: NYT - Japanese Government Says Decommissioning Fukushima Reactors Will Take 40 Years [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,875 posts)3. But what did they cost to build in the first place?
And what would the decommissioning have cost if there had been no accident?
http://www.thestar.com/comment/columnists/article/665644
[font face=Times, Serif][font size=5]$26B cost killed nuclear bid[/font]
2009/07/14 04:30:00
By Tyler Hamilton Energy and Technology Columnist
[font size=3]The Ontario government put its nuclear power plans on hold last month because the bid from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., the only "compliant" one received, was more than three times higher than what the province expected to pay, the Star has learned.
Sources close to the bidding, one involved directly in one of the bids, said that adding two next-generation Candu reactors at Darlington generating station would have cost around $26 billion.
It means a single project would have wiped out the province's nuclear-power expansion budget for the next 20 years, leaving no money for at least two more multibillion-dollar refurbishment projects.
The bid from France's Areva NP also blew past expectations, sources said. Areva's bid came in at $23.6 billion, with two 1,600-megawatt reactors costing $7.8 billion and the rest of the plant costing $15.8 billion. It works out to $7,375 per kilowatt, and was based on a similar cost estimate Areva had submitted for a plant proposed in Maryland.
[/font][/font]
2009/07/14 04:30:00
By Tyler Hamilton Energy and Technology Columnist
[font size=3]The Ontario government put its nuclear power plans on hold last month because the bid from Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., the only "compliant" one received, was more than three times higher than what the province expected to pay, the Star has learned.
Sources close to the bidding, one involved directly in one of the bids, said that adding two next-generation Candu reactors at Darlington generating station would have cost around $26 billion.
It means a single project would have wiped out the province's nuclear-power expansion budget for the next 20 years, leaving no money for at least two more multibillion-dollar refurbishment projects.
The bid from France's Areva NP also blew past expectations, sources said. Areva's bid came in at $23.6 billion, with two 1,600-megawatt reactors costing $7.8 billion and the rest of the plant costing $15.8 billion. It works out to $7,375 per kilowatt, and was based on a similar cost estimate Areva had submitted for a plant proposed in Maryland.
[/font][/font]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT - Japanese Government Says Decommissioning Fukushima Reactors Will Take 40 Years [View all]
hatrack
Dec 2011
OP
Since the public is going to have to pay eventually, TEPCO's shareholder value should disappear now
Kolesar
Dec 2011
#4
Well, this is the model you said you prefer, a for-profit company with government oversight
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2011
#15
I think you'd eventually have a raft of problems just as bad as you now see.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#17
And energy shouldn't be in the hands of governments that amass power over people.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#20