Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
46. You might wish to reconsider the monstrous implications of your post which I doubt you meant.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:50 PM
Oct 2012
Posted by NNadir

Do you know what another word for genetic modification is? It's called E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N.

When evolution is manipulated for human uses - as has been done for many millennia - it's called Breeding.


Those words are not used when the processes you describe are applied to human subjects. Those processes are not ethically or legally applicable to human populations, in fact.

Do you know the reason why PEOPLE OVER PROFITS will prevail? Too many children are ill. Consider that as a population American children are the sickest in history and that GMO foods introduced in the 1990's top the list of potential contributing environmental causes.

Here's a chance for the industry to reboot - remove food from the biotech world and carry-on with miracle drug development.


http://chronicle.augusta.com/opinion/letters/2012-09-28/candidates-mum-autism?v=1348871764


COMMENT: http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2012/9/24/californias-preparation-for-treating-adults-with-autism-in-question.aspx

“About 60,000 residents currently receive state-funded services for developmental disabilities, a significant increase from the fewer than 5,000 residents who received such services in the mid-1990s.

“A large percentage of such residents are people younger than 22, the age when they no longer qualify for special education services in public schools.

“In the next three years, thousands of young adults with autism in California will reach that age threshold.”


How long can our nation survive with an increasing population of dependent adults? Our federal health officials have watched autism overwhelm a generation of children and done nothing to stop it. Officials still can’t say for sure how much of the exponential growth in autism is a real increase or just “better diagnosing.” When will they know? When the rate is one in every 10 children?

If the candidates are so worried about the economy, they should consider what autism is going to cost us.
Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism


COMMENT: There are more childen with autism today than all the other childhood diseases mentioned here including cancer, downs syndrome etc. It is the fastest growing disability. Perhaps you don't know that 25 years ago the number affected was 1 in 10,000. Now it is 1 in 54 boys in this country. It's 1 in 29 boys in New Jersey.

1 in 5 children in school has a developmental disability.

There is no other illness in the US that is increasing as quickly as autism. That is why it needs special attention. Autism classes are bursting at the seams and the schools cannot handle the size or the cost. If we don't stop this epidemic now-we will all be paying for them in our taxes forever because the majority will never be able to support themselves. We are losing generations of children to autism. That's why the president and congress must do something now. You talk about national debt-how about supporting 3-4 million children with autism 10 years from now or sooner?


Oh, yeah, this, too: http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/age-of-autism-weekly-wrap-lacrosse-drinks-brian-deer-koolaid.html#more
(includes excerpt of testimony under oath by fully exonerated pediatric gastroenterologist and co-founder of the field, '...we were finding a new disorder. … We were beginning to see a new syndrome, fairly clear features of children [with regressive developmental disorders] presenting with diarrhoea, very often abdominal pain which often was not diagnosed by other doctors. ...There is a characteristic symptom pattern...')

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great news! Laurajr Sep 2012 #1
It would be nice to see Monsanto go the way of the unhappycamper Sep 2012 #2
... xchrom Sep 2012 #3
More hysteria. Do you really think these things through? Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #4
and how much does monsanto pay you? n/t Pharaoh Sep 2012 #5
Excellent response! Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #16
If YOU think it's hysteria and ignorance, then maybe... MattSh Sep 2012 #25
Yes, how dare anyone attack a Bain Capital-funded company! valerief Sep 2012 #6
Unfortunately, science in on Monsanto's side. Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #17
unfortunately we don't really know that Viva_La_Revolution Sep 2012 #20
Science is on Monsanto's side GitRDun Sep 2012 #26
Bullshit! Webster Green Sep 2012 #27
It ain't tama Sep 2012 #28
Yeah, what do all those nations banning GMOs know? valerief Sep 2012 #31
Absolutely not. See 'Scientists Under Attack' (German documentary on INDEPENDENT biotech research). proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #33
Thanks for the great info, proverbial! If I believed in Evil, Monsatan would be top of my list. They Mnemosyne Sep 2012 #42
The movement in the prop is to label GMOs lunasun Sep 2012 #9
If you are under the impression that the world can be fed with "organic" food, you are very mistaken Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #19
hey even Haiti after disaster and in need of food help rejected the free GMO seeds lunasun Sep 2012 #29
I doubt it. truebluegreen Sep 2012 #34
Is the world presently being fed? roody Sep 2012 #39
Please explain.... blackspade Sep 2012 #14
Do you really think that labeling of foods would spell the end of Monsanto? Buzz Clik Sep 2012 #18
then what's the problem? Viva_La_Revolution Sep 2012 #22
That is not the point.... blackspade Sep 2012 #41
FYI, some reading about Monsanto and ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Commission); Bain, too. proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #23
Whats so ignorant about wanting to know what's in the food-like substances that we ingest? arikara Sep 2012 #44
I hope we can label all GMOs in the US, like Europe has. Overseas Sep 2012 #7
+1! nt Viva_La_Revolution Sep 2012 #21
Monsanto ain't going away because of a label... tinrobot Sep 2012 #8
Tell that... Loudestlib Sep 2012 #10
I read labels and so do a lot of other people. RC Sep 2012 #12
I stopped buying a number of products that contain high-fructose corn syrup LiberalEsto Sep 2012 #15
please beware of beet sugar too lunasun Sep 2012 #30
Didn't know that LiberalEsto Sep 2012 #36
i doubt it high end chefs using local organic is rich peoples fare from what service workers say lunasun Sep 2012 #38
So they have nothing to fear and should have no objection to the labeling for us 5% who read them. Overseas Sep 2012 #24
Yeah, that's why there're so many low-sodium foods on the market. valerief Sep 2012 #32
I agree and I am in front of roody Sep 2012 #40
Prop 37 LoisB Sep 2012 #11
This will be a big fight mainly due to the fact Monsanto has all the seeds patented! The farmers jonesgirl Sep 2012 #13
Finding a Monsanto GMO corn pesticide in the blood of pregnant women/umbilcal cord samples is ok? proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #35
typo - umbilical proverbialwisdom Sep 2012 #37
Right now, 90% of the soybeans grown on earth have stacked genetic traits. NNadir Sep 2012 #43
So what, this is just a labeling scheme. They're not banning products from market. Sirveri Oct 2012 #45
You might wish to reconsider the monstrous implications of your post which I doubt you meant. proverbialwisdom Oct 2012 #46
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise' proverbialwisdom Oct 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»is the end of monsanto ne...»Reply #46