Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: is the end of monsanto near? prop 37 succeeding as nations ban GMO [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)46. You might wish to reconsider the monstrous implications of your post which I doubt you meant.
Posted by NNadir
Do you know what another word for genetic modification is? It's called E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N.
When evolution is manipulated for human uses - as has been done for many millennia - it's called Breeding.
Do you know what another word for genetic modification is? It's called E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N.
When evolution is manipulated for human uses - as has been done for many millennia - it's called Breeding.
Those words are not used when the processes you describe are applied to human subjects. Those processes are not ethically or legally applicable to human populations, in fact.
Do you know the reason why PEOPLE OVER PROFITS will prevail? Too many children are ill. Consider that as a population American children are the sickest in history and that GMO foods introduced in the 1990's top the list of potential contributing environmental causes.
Here's a chance for the industry to reboot - remove food from the biotech world and carry-on with miracle drug development.
http://chronicle.augusta.com/opinion/letters/2012-09-28/candidates-mum-autism?v=1348871764
COMMENT: http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2012/9/24/californias-preparation-for-treating-adults-with-autism-in-question.aspx
How long can our nation survive with an increasing population of dependent adults? Our federal health officials have watched autism overwhelm a generation of children and done nothing to stop it. Officials still cant say for sure how much of the exponential growth in autism is a real increase or just better diagnosing. When will they know? When the rate is one in every 10 children?
If the candidates are so worried about the economy, they should consider what autism is going to cost us.
Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
COMMENT: There are more childen with autism today than all the other childhood diseases mentioned here including cancer, downs syndrome etc. It is the fastest growing disability. Perhaps you don't know that 25 years ago the number affected was 1 in 10,000. Now it is 1 in 54 boys in this country. It's 1 in 29 boys in New Jersey.
1 in 5 children in school has a developmental disability.
There is no other illness in the US that is increasing as quickly as autism. That is why it needs special attention. Autism classes are bursting at the seams and the schools cannot handle the size or the cost. If we don't stop this epidemic now-we will all be paying for them in our taxes forever because the majority will never be able to support themselves. We are losing generations of children to autism. That's why the president and congress must do something now. You talk about national debt-how about supporting 3-4 million children with autism 10 years from now or sooner?
COMMENT: http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2012/9/24/californias-preparation-for-treating-adults-with-autism-in-question.aspx
About 60,000 residents currently receive state-funded services for developmental disabilities, a significant increase from the fewer than 5,000 residents who received such services in the mid-1990s.
A large percentage of such residents are people younger than 22, the age when they no longer qualify for special education services in public schools.
In the next three years, thousands of young adults with autism in California will reach that age threshold.
How long can our nation survive with an increasing population of dependent adults? Our federal health officials have watched autism overwhelm a generation of children and done nothing to stop it. Officials still cant say for sure how much of the exponential growth in autism is a real increase or just better diagnosing. When will they know? When the rate is one in every 10 children?
If the candidates are so worried about the economy, they should consider what autism is going to cost us.
Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
COMMENT: There are more childen with autism today than all the other childhood diseases mentioned here including cancer, downs syndrome etc. It is the fastest growing disability. Perhaps you don't know that 25 years ago the number affected was 1 in 10,000. Now it is 1 in 54 boys in this country. It's 1 in 29 boys in New Jersey.
1 in 5 children in school has a developmental disability.
There is no other illness in the US that is increasing as quickly as autism. That is why it needs special attention. Autism classes are bursting at the seams and the schools cannot handle the size or the cost. If we don't stop this epidemic now-we will all be paying for them in our taxes forever because the majority will never be able to support themselves. We are losing generations of children to autism. That's why the president and congress must do something now. You talk about national debt-how about supporting 3-4 million children with autism 10 years from now or sooner?
Oh, yeah, this, too: http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/09/age-of-autism-weekly-wrap-lacrosse-drinks-brian-deer-koolaid.html#more
(includes excerpt of testimony under oath by fully exonerated pediatric gastroenterologist and co-founder of the field, '...we were finding a new disorder. We were beginning to see a new syndrome, fairly clear features of children [with regressive developmental disorders] presenting with diarrhoea, very often abdominal pain which often was not diagnosed by other doctors. ...There is a characteristic symptom pattern...')
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely not. See 'Scientists Under Attack' (German documentary on INDEPENDENT biotech research).
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2012
#33
Thanks for the great info, proverbial! If I believed in Evil, Monsatan would be top of my list. They
Mnemosyne
Sep 2012
#42
If you are under the impression that the world can be fed with "organic" food, you are very mistaken
Buzz Clik
Sep 2012
#19
hey even Haiti after disaster and in need of food help rejected the free GMO seeds
lunasun
Sep 2012
#29
FYI, some reading about Monsanto and ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Commission); Bain, too.
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2012
#23
Whats so ignorant about wanting to know what's in the food-like substances that we ingest?
arikara
Sep 2012
#44
I stopped buying a number of products that contain high-fructose corn syrup
LiberalEsto
Sep 2012
#15
i doubt it high end chefs using local organic is rich peoples fare from what service workers say
lunasun
Sep 2012
#38
So they have nothing to fear and should have no objection to the labeling for us 5% who read them.
Overseas
Sep 2012
#24
This will be a big fight mainly due to the fact Monsanto has all the seeds patented! The farmers
jonesgirl
Sep 2012
#13
Finding a Monsanto GMO corn pesticide in the blood of pregnant women/umbilcal cord samples is ok?
proverbialwisdom
Sep 2012
#35
So what, this is just a labeling scheme. They're not banning products from market.
Sirveri
Oct 2012
#45
You might wish to reconsider the monstrous implications of your post which I doubt you meant.
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2012
#46
Business Section NYT: 'The Epi-Pen's Maker Invests in Expansion As Allergy Rates in Children Rise'
proverbialwisdom
Oct 2012
#47