Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
21. NOAA begs to differ...
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 06:13 AM
Oct 2012

Last edited Thu Oct 11, 2012, 07:07 AM - Edit history (1)

A Paleo Perspective on Abrupt Climate Change

Imagine that over the course of a decade or two, the long, snowy winters of northern New England were replaced by the milder winters of a place like Washington, D.C. Or that a sharp decrease in rainfall turned the short-grass prairie of the western Great Plains into a desert landscape like you would see in Arizona. Changes of this sort would obviously have important impacts on humans, affecting the crops we grow, the availability of water, and our energy usage.

These scenarios are not science fiction. Paleoclimate records indicate that climate changes of this size and speed have occurred at many times in the past. Past human civilizations were sometimes successful in adapting to the climate changes and at other times they were not.

Because they occur relatively rapidly, these sorts of climate change are called abrupt climate change. Our understanding of past abrupt climate changes and their causes is still in its infancy; most of the research on this topic has been completed since the early 1990s. Scientists have made significant progress, however, in identifying and describing various abrupt events of the past and forming hypotheses about their causes. This paleo perspective will describe the evidence for past abrupt climate change and explore some of the possible causes.

Even from the proxy data that exist, one thing is relatively certain: our climate system is not always well-behaved. It can, and often does, change in surprising ways. Positive feedbacks are a key ingredient for this behavior, amplifying a small change or perturbation in the climate system. Paleo records also show that abrupt changes happen during both glacial and interglacial periods, although they may take on different characteristics when large ice sheets exist on Earth. During the Holocene, for example, regional-scale droughts have been very important, while weakening of the meridional overturning circulation had consequences on the hemispheric-to-global scale during the last glacial period.

Learn NOAA's story of abrupt climate change here: The Story

The supporting data is here: The Data

The possibility of abrupt climate change can't be so cavalierly dismissed, unless you're prepared to take on NOAA's science with something more than a blog post.

There may not be any reason to prepare for abrupt climate change, of course, because we don't know what may be in the cards for us in terms of the nature, the severity or the timing. The other thing that makes planning for abrupt change, whether in climate and food production or global finance, a problematic affair is the human factor: the usual thing that causes large non-linear or inflective changes in human behaviour is the occurrence of an external event, not the attempt to avoid it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"the system will deteriorate with increasing acceleration" Ghost Dog Oct 2012 #1
Having studied the mathematics of chaos theory, Speck Tater Oct 2012 #2
Sorry, but not at all plausible. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #4
Science often goes counter to common sense. Speck Tater Oct 2012 #11
The science says I'm largely correct. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #12
Whatever. Speck Tater Oct 2012 #13
NOAA begs to differ... GliderGuider Oct 2012 #21
The main problem is with scenarios like..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #29
A very simple dynamic system can flip. reusrename Oct 2012 #34
That's not quite what I'm reading. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #41
There is a small, but very common, misconception contained in what you say here. reusrename Oct 2012 #54
Glad you cleared that up. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #57
You're no less correct than the article in the OP. reusrename Oct 2012 #32
But what evidence is there...... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #43
Not to beat your dead horse, but RobertEarl Oct 2012 #45
Some good points, but....... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #46
I'm not clear on something GliderGuider Oct 2012 #53
Yup! reusrename Oct 2012 #55
GWP of methane is much higher, and then it oxidizes into CO2 anyway. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #56
What I'm saying is, no plausible argument exists..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #58
Calthrate gun hype? RobertEarl Oct 2012 #59
It's a theoretical scenario. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #60
Theoretical? RobertEarl Oct 2012 #61
Yes, I get that. n/t AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #62
Just in case. I will repeat RobertEarl Oct 2012 #63
Exactly! reusrename Oct 2012 #64
Not the best article I've come across. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #3
Not the most honest reply that I've come across. Nihil Oct 2012 #6
Notice, though, that I never once claimed that this article talked about Venus or extinction.... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #7
So that makes much of your post a red herring. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #9
Birds and the bees, flowers and the trees RobertEarl Oct 2012 #5
I'm not at all convinced that climate change is anywhere near the only culprit........ AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #8
Of course it's not. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #10
Amazing how closely the Chaos Theory, ... CRH Oct 2012 #14
Not really true. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #15
You need to expand your horizons, I think. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #16
I do very well realize there are problems, but..... AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author GliderGuider Oct 2012 #20
If the patterns of the climate shift so rapidly, ... CRH Oct 2012 #17
I'm not exactly optimistic, CRH. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #18
You consistently have posts that are optimistic, ... CRH Oct 2012 #22
In your opinion, perhaps so. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #25
Addendum to post 22, ... CRH Oct 2012 #23
+1 GliderGuider Oct 2012 #24
Cheerleading much? AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #27
For fuck's sake. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #26
There is nothing we can do RobertEarl Oct 2012 #28
See #30 nt tama Oct 2012 #31
Robert, scientific research says we CAN. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #36
I'll tell you how RobertEarl Oct 2012 #37
Now we're cooking. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #39
Heh, not me man RobertEarl Oct 2012 #44
Re: "if you point fingers at your culprits, make sure you are without sin." AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #47
Transition tama Oct 2012 #50
Terra preta and forest gardening tama Oct 2012 #30
Terra preta is the only thing I've found so far that I think might help overall. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #33
Hugelkultur tama Oct 2012 #35
Permaculture is a remarkable philosophy. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #38
I definitely agree. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #40
Remember "End of Suburbia"? tama Oct 2012 #49
Absolutely! At the end of March I heard American activist Charles Simmons speak about this. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #51
From what I've seen tama Oct 2012 #52
Frickin' awesome stuff, tama, thank you for posting that. =) AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #42
And it's picking up tama Oct 2012 #48
Here's something that's that's suggestive of a chaotic flip: GliderGuider Oct 2012 #65
Chaotic Flip: pscot Oct 2012 #66
I've never understood the value of chaos theory as a predictor wtmusic Oct 2012 #67
No prediction, just an illustrative analogy. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #68
Thanks wtmusic Oct 2012 #70
TBH, you're probably mostly correct. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #69
I got about 80 pages into James Gleick's book wtmusic Oct 2012 #71
No problem, I think we're on the same page. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #72
Not a theory, but a paradigm, Iterate Oct 2012 #73
That was a very illuminating contribution. GliderGuider Oct 2012 #74
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What Environmental Report...»Reply #21