Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

CRH

(1,553 posts)

5. About the warm arctic water, ...

Reply to GliderGuider (Reply #4)

Mon Oct 29, 2012, 08:13 PM

Oct 2012

I was thinking the same thing, but unable in my mind to visualize the necessary shift in both water and air currents. And how does the inland low cold front effect the path? There is a lot at play in this storm, and it appears a lot of norms are changing.

At any rate with the low barometer, it can only mean more water inundation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AGW to Senator Inhofe: "Can you hear me now?" [View all] GliderGuider Oct 2012 OP

Na, he can't or won't hear you. Haven't you heard they are spreading the rumor Obama seeded the southernyankeebelle Oct 2012 #1

Inhofe is one of the very worst deniers. I'm waiting for him to wake up-Ha! nt babylonsister Oct 2012 #2

He won't. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #8

Have you noticed the barometrics on this storm, ... CRH Oct 2012 #3

Yep. I'm also wondering how much influence warm arctic water had GliderGuider Oct 2012 #4

About the warm arctic water, ... CRH Oct 2012 #5

Well.....maybe, but we really don't know for sure. Not yet, anyhow. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #7

Sorry but Jimmie is deaf madokie Oct 2012 #6

Setting aside that fact that Senator Bible-Answer-Man cannot, in fact, hear . . . hatrack Oct 2012 #9