Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)44. Is this where you are coming from?
"You bent me over and fucked me up the ass, executives. Please, can I have some more?"
That seems like an accurate depiction, eh?
Mine is: We coulda had a solar V-8.
We are obviously very far apart in actually describing the last 30 year history of power production.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]
Kolesar
Oct 2012
OP
Gunderson is so full of shit it would be funny, if he wasn't terrifying people
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#13
And when those measures occurred, the generating sources are taken offline.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#30
And unlike many here presume, we have not been sitting on our hands since Fukushima
Throckmorton
Nov 2012
#34
I wonder how he feels about the possibility that teh nucular will turn the Earth into Venus?
GliderGuider
Nov 2012
#42