Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
7. I don't see it as a future
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 03:32 PM
Nov 2012

I see it as an alternative thread of reality that we cannot reach in our current projectory (unless a large global bottleneck allows people to reset the social & agricultural model). A few brilliant people are doing it (I hope to be one if I can ever afford land).

Everything about agro-forestry contradicts our very social model. It doesn't produce instant return, allowing for instant growth (4-7 years of zero yield). It doesn't require a large amount of debt to start (no machines, little processing of outputs), fueling constant production. It doesn't require a massive amount of inputs or water, and almost zero once its established. It doesn't even require a major time commitment from "farmers" unless you scale up. If every one had a half to quarter acre of a forest garden, it would basically run itself once established.

There is a reason many native American tribes would practice this form of agriculture (and civilization has rejected their way of life).

Unfortunately, while I don't see it as the future, I believe it is one of the only models we can utilize going forward to also heal the planet.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Woody Harrelson pushes tr...»Reply #7