Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit —

[FBaggins]

76. I can't believe that you're that incapable of distinguishing within a range.

Yet time and time again you prove that faith misplaced.

Do you really see no scale at all between "kills" and "safe"?

Thyroid cancer is rarely deadly (particularly when they're looking for it)... but isn't a 5% increase in the chances of getting it (much higher than reality of course) a reason to leave an area during a nuclear crisis? You really think that the only time people evacuate is if "staying here = dying!" ???

And once the active release period is over and contamination levels are identified. Can't you see the possibility of restricting access to areas that would increase risk if you stayed there 24/7 for a couple years?

You can't possibly be that dense. I retain the belief that there's almost a 50/50 chance that you're actually a nuclear proponent just trying to make the anti-nuclear crowd look irrational. There's simply no reason to build a strawman when we've got you walking around adopting the wildest errant positions.

So I guess thanks are in order!