Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)81. The science is not, in fact, "clear as mud"
You're just exceptionally blind. Even when things have been simplified dramatically.
Why have they evacuated the people from their ancestral lands from around Chernobyl and Fukushima?
Allow me to simplify the answer for you again.
It isn't because if people went there they would die. Do you admit that you think that is the reason?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]
Kolesar
Oct 2012
OP
Gunderson is so full of shit it would be funny, if he wasn't terrifying people
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#13
And when those measures occurred, the generating sources are taken offline.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#30
And unlike many here presume, we have not been sitting on our hands since Fukushima
Throckmorton
Nov 2012
#34
I wonder how he feels about the possibility that teh nucular will turn the Earth into Venus?
GliderGuider
Nov 2012
#42