Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]PamW
(1,825 posts)92. You shouldn't be.
RobertEarl,
I like a challenge.
I want to see if I can educate those with the least amount of intellect and knowledge on this board.
I believe even rank political propagandists that don't have one microgram of scientific ability can be turned around
and shown that what the public needs is good scientific information and not ignorance-based propaganda.
I see I can always count on your lack of intellectual skills to misinterpret every thing I say.
You shouldn't be encouraged; you should be ashamed. You are the classic "bad example".
PamW
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gundersen: 26 nuclear plants in area where Hurricane Sandy likely to hit — [View all]
Kolesar
Oct 2012
OP
Gunderson is so full of shit it would be funny, if he wasn't terrifying people
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#13
And when those measures occurred, the generating sources are taken offline.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2012
#30
And unlike many here presume, we have not been sitting on our hands since Fukushima
Throckmorton
Nov 2012
#34
I wonder how he feels about the possibility that teh nucular will turn the Earth into Venus?
GliderGuider
Nov 2012
#42