Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(4,795 posts)

3. Yeah. Reducing consumption of energy is not viable

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:52 PM

Nov 2012

How would the infinite growth machine roll on without its three squares a day?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Powerships' May Replace South Korea's Offline Nuclear Reactors [View all] phantom power Nov 2012 OP

To be fair, they really don't have many options NickB79 Nov 2012 #1

I agree, shutdown was the responsible thing phantom power Nov 2012 #2

Yeah. Reducing consumption of energy is not viable NoOneMan Nov 2012 #3