Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(28,678 posts)

5. Not wind by itself. You would need a stable grid.

Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:58 PM

Nov 2012

You don't want parts of the line to turn off with molten metal in them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Linking wind energy with production of steel [View all] exboyfil Nov 2012 OP

I read it took 300 tons of steel to stand up a 300-foot turbine tower. phantom power Nov 2012 #1

That would be a side benefit exboyfil Nov 2012 #2

I think you missed the point (or I am) NoOneMan Nov 2012 #3

My thinking was closer to yours, although... phantom power Nov 2012 #4

That definitely would free up some amount of energy NoOneMan Nov 2012 #6

Not wind by itself. You would need a stable grid. FBaggins Nov 2012 #5

Thats what the enormous oil-powered bellow is for NoOneMan Nov 2012 #7