Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Who Killed the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR)? [View all]SpoonFed
(853 posts)You're flawed argument (and personal attack) rests on the premise that anyone who thinks that nuclear power (in all it's forms promised over the years) is a waste of time and money is irrational. You'd do a better job at pretending to have a rational, superior position on the subject if your post wasn't rife with personal insults and otherwise content-less. You've apparently come to the right place and fitting right in after only 50 posts.
Here's a suggestion if you want to be perceived as more than a pro-nuke insulting interloper, make some valid points supporting nuclear power. The problem for you ofcourse is that all rational arguments point in the other direction. Nuclear power in all its varied forms is an incredibly risky, costly and totally unnecessary way to generate power in 2011 and forward.
Thanks for stopping by to throw it out there that it's those against wasteful spending on flawed technology, massive government subsidies of giant elephants with inadequate insurance with no realistic plan for waste fuel storage are to blame for the technology's and industry's shortcomings. It's funny. Not valid, but funny.
Oh woah is me, the irrational fear that the nuke power industry is unnecessary!