Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
12. .....
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:57 PM
Nov 2012
In fact, hemp has been generously assumed to have a much higher joule per acre yield,


Where, exactly, did you hear this?

A "pet theory" is how you basically describe the entire scientific concept of green house gasses and global warming?


Please don't take me out of context. The pet theories I'm talking about, are ones like reducing consumption of all types of energy, period, will a silver bullet that solves the climate change issue, or Malcolm Light's belief that all life will be extinct my mid-century, etc.

Forgive me for extrapolating that in order to reduce atmospheric carbon, we have to actually reduce carbon emissions.


Yes we do, and in fact, I never implied otherwise. But we don't have to stop consuming ALL energy, just those forms of it which are causing major pollution in the atmosphere such as coal, gas, or petrol. And while stopping consumption of these certain fuels would indeed be beneficial in the long run, I've come to the conclusion that the time has passed for that alone to be fully effective, and that we'll also need to consider carbon sequestration as well; planting trees, especially ones such as mangroves, would be a good start.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate change evident ac...»Reply #12