Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Obama primary opponent Bob Greene: Calif. man has energy plan for U.S. for next 1000 years [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)29. "to build the largest manufacturing industry in the history of mankind"
"The science is understood.
The material is abundant.
The products work.
All that is left is to build the largest manufacturing industry in the history of mankind.
This is what we intend to do."
The material is abundant.
The products work.
All that is left is to build the largest manufacturing industry in the history of mankind.
This is what we intend to do."
Ovshinsky: I can show now that we can achieve solar energy, with good profit, at a cost less than that of burning of fossil fuel. That is a revolutionary statement, and it cant be done overnight, but it can and will be done. The plant would be an ordinary-sized plant of 150,000 square feet which would put out a photovoltaic product of one gigawatt per year. Unless we start making a gigawatt in many plants, the cost of photovoltaics will never get down to the cost of coal which is what global society needs.
This can be done with proper support in no more than several years. The cost of the production machine will be a few pennies per watt, $350 million at the most. Ive proven in the past that the first machine always costs more than the subsequent ones. When you go into a high enough volume production, all costs come down in the steepest decline that you can think of. And you want to build as many machines as possible in every city in every country."
This can be done with proper support in no more than several years. The cost of the production machine will be a few pennies per watt, $350 million at the most. Ive proven in the past that the first machine always costs more than the subsequent ones. When you go into a high enough volume production, all costs come down in the steepest decline that you can think of. And you want to build as many machines as possible in every city in every country."
http://bos.sagepub.com/content/67/3/1.full
http://www.1366tech.com/about-1366/
That deserved repeating. Thanks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama primary opponent Bob Greene: Calif. man has energy plan for U.S. for next 1000 years [View all]
Maslo55
Jan 2012
OP
Without adequate excess capacity *and* energy storage, wind / solar will never get us off fossils
txlibdem
Jan 2012
#14
People in the solar industry think they can get solar at or less than the cost of coal much faster.
FSSF
Jan 2012
#22
So you think it's ok to villainize people just for disagreeing with your anti-nuke views?
txlibdem
Jan 2012
#12