Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Kill the Economy [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,875 posts)19. OK, let’s see…
The green revolution that was
what
? 40's to 60's? (We havent learned any lessons from that have we?
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-01/second-green-revolution-alliance-organic-farmers-and-genetic-engineers
Genetic Engineering
I dont know that weve seen any nightmare fallout from this yet, although I will admit to feeling that it has been relatively short sighted.
Micro-loans allow people in poverty to prosper, and have more children? (Are you sure about this?) Generally, improving peoples living conditions tends to lead to them having fewer children. http://www.accion.org/page.aspx?pid=1876
[font face=Serif][font size=4]INVESTING IN WOMEN, AND THE FUTURE[/font]
[font size=3]Microloans for women are a forceful 1-2 punch against disempowerment and poverty. International development initiatives that give marginalized women the chance to earn income enjoy the double benefits of both raising the social status of women while having a greater impact on indicators of poverty such as family health, education and overall economic growth.
Researchers have found that women are more likely to put earned income to good use than their husbands, because they have the best perspective on the needs of the family . When women are economically empowered, children are more likely to be educated and healthy, and more money is likely to be reinvested into the family enterprise.
Furthermore, women with more decision-making power and financial resources are better able to plan their pregnancies, and ultimately, bear fewer children. The fewer children a woman bears, the more resources are available for each family member, and the better quality of life the family will have. This also has environmental implications, as human overpopulation threatens the delicate ecological balance of the earth. And so, it has been seen that empowering women to take control of their reproduction has a powerful impact on economic development and environmental sustainability.
The benefits of providing microloans for women are obvious, and many. ACCION International and its partners provide microfinance services to both genders, but with a heavier focus on women in areas such as India where gender equality lags. Through the development of a thriving commercial microfinance industry, ACCION seeks to bring economic empowerment to millions of microentrepreneurs who need it. Eventually, impoverished women will find it possible and even commonplace to take their livelihoods into their own hands.
[/font][/font]
http://www.literature.org/authors/dickens-charles/christmas-carol/chapter-01.html
If they would rather die, said Scrooge, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
“The modern economy is slavery; it forces everyone to work in such a way their labor is exploited…”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#2
Why do you think people make "poor" choices that make them life-long servants to debt?
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#43
Why? Are we born that way? Are we molded that way to benefit something? Do we "choose" it?
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#47
I think Wesley had the right idea, that it takes training to combat our “natural instincts”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#48
Natural instincts? I don't see hunter-gatherers going into debt, consuming everything in sight
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#49
I completely reject your premise that humans just naturally want material objects
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#51
"Our key error was our choice to see ourselves as being separate from the world that sustains us"
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#114
The level that consumerism requires isn't natural. We are conditioned to it as a matter of policy:
cprise
Dec 2012
#88
“It is a proven fact that health has declined drastically since the onset of agriculture…”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#107
“…only makes sense among a diseased population living with stress and nutritional deficiencies.”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#128
Agriculture as “Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”? – Anthropology 2.1
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#124
I feel like Antrosio just rubbed feces into my cortex while urinating on Diamond's name
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#126
“… shorter stature … agriculture coincided with a massive reduction to human health”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#145
"A decline of stature of historic populations has been used to indicate nutritional status."
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#146
Interacting with an environment not of your choosing has no impact on the veracity of one's message
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#159
Billions of people are malnourished and a billion face perpetual hunger already
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#168
Almost all the health care advances are merely to negate the consequences of nutritional deficits,
DonCoquixote
Dec 2012
#59
"One of the most profound changes to occur with the foraging to farming transition.....
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#77
the kind of "real" that matters is "stuff happening to me directly" - which is starting too
phantom power
Dec 2012
#3
"'survival of the fittest' does not quite work under these conditions", we THINK.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#39
This much is certain, we can affect our environment. (We’ve been doing it for millennia.)
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#15
It seems my skepticism about microfinance was misdirected, but not misplaced
GliderGuider
Dec 2012
#27