Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
2. I'm not arguing at all about the sea rise here, just pointing out a fact most people aren't aware of
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 08:15 AM
Dec 2012

Last edited Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:58 AM - Edit history (1)

I'll have to find the article pointing this out and I'll post a link to it later.

Most people expect the sea levels to rise uniformly, however that isn't the case because of gravity and how the weight of the ice caps is distributed. So, as the ice caps melt, the weight on the land mass beneath them will decrease. This in turn affects plate tectonics. Without getting into too much detail (as I don't have all of the facts in front of me right now), scientist predict that some portions of the globe will see the sea levels drop (mainly around the northern european/scandinavian areas), stay the same in some areas, and rise drastically in other areas (equatorial regions). So, that 1 meter number is averaged out. The people who will see a rise will most likely see a very drastic rise that could me more than 1 meter.

I really need to find this article. It was published in Der Spiegel about a year ago (if I remember correctly). Again, I'll try to dig for it and post it when I get the chance to.

----edit----

Found it. The article is actually 2 years old. It even has some nice charts and maps too.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-uncertainties-of-global-warming-sea-level-could-rise-in-south-fall-in-north-a-732303.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Keep voting for those Koch Brothers America! sellitman Dec 2012 #1
I'm not arguing at all about the sea rise here, just pointing out a fact most people aren't aware of Victor_c3 Dec 2012 #2
Interesting article dipsydoodle Dec 2012 #17
When I saw the OP, I didn't know which one was meant. DFW Dec 2012 #3
One difference of opinion here: burnsei sensei Dec 2012 #4
Your estimates/info may be way off. Coyotl Dec 2012 #5
Antarctica is adding snowpack. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #6
Why? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #7
The immobility of the ice, and the total amount of heat required to melt it. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #8
Thanks. That is a lot of ice NoOneMan Dec 2012 #9
Yep. The methane releases kind of scare the shit out of me. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #12
Yes, in the highest elevations and the glacier is losing 60 cm a year at low elevations Coyotl Dec 2012 #11
Wrong 'end' of the planet. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #13
Both ends of the planet. Coyotl Dec 2012 #15
True, but the story down south is more complex than that. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #16
Antarctica is in fact losing ice NickB79 Dec 2012 #18
kick for later. eom ellenfl Dec 2012 #10
This may get the attention of those one-percenters living in the Hamptons wtmusic Dec 2012 #14
..by the end of this century... truebrit71 Dec 2012 #19
Similar article about Vancouver, BC NoOneMan Dec 2012 #20
The only thing I disagree with is about building dikes for a 1m rise muriel_volestrangler Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Bye, Bye Alexandria: A 1-...»Reply #2