Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Kill the Economy [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,875 posts)151. “This is the science. These are the facts.” Uh huh…
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-07/l-hmg071911.php
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071721/
[font face=Serif]Public release date: 20-Jul-2011
Contact: Dr. Jane Green
arenehan@picr.man.ac.uk
44-018-652-89659
Lancet
[font size=5]Height might give clue to cancer risk[/font]
[font size=3]Taller people are at increased risk of a wide range of cancers, according to an Article published Online First in The Lancet Oncology. In women the risk of cancer rises by about 16% for every 10cm (4 inches) increase in height. Previous studies have shown a link between height and cancer risk, but this research extends the findings to more cancers and for women with differing lifestyles and economic backgrounds. The results suggest that increases in the height of populations over the course of the 20th century might explain some of the changes in cancer incidence over time.
To investigate the impact of height on overall and site-specific cancer risk, Jane Green from the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and colleagues assessed the association between height, other factors relevant for cancer, and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study, which included 1.3 million middle-aged women in the UK enrolled between 1996 and 2001. During an average follow-up time of about 10 years, 97 000 cases of cancer were identified.
The risk of total cancer increased with increasing height, as did the risk of many different types of cancer, including cancers of the breast, ovary, womb, bowel, leukaemia and malignant melanoma.
Jane Green, lead author of the study says: "We showed that the link between greater height and increased total cancer risk is similar across many different populations from Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America. The link between height and cancer risk seems to be common to many different types of cancer and in different people; suggesting that there may be a basic common mechanism, perhaps acting early in peoples' lives, when they are growing." *
[/font][/font]
Contact: Dr. Jane Green
arenehan@picr.man.ac.uk
44-018-652-89659
Lancet
[font size=5]Height might give clue to cancer risk[/font]
[font size=3]Taller people are at increased risk of a wide range of cancers, according to an Article published Online First in The Lancet Oncology. In women the risk of cancer rises by about 16% for every 10cm (4 inches) increase in height. Previous studies have shown a link between height and cancer risk, but this research extends the findings to more cancers and for women with differing lifestyles and economic backgrounds. The results suggest that increases in the height of populations over the course of the 20th century might explain some of the changes in cancer incidence over time.
To investigate the impact of height on overall and site-specific cancer risk, Jane Green from the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and colleagues assessed the association between height, other factors relevant for cancer, and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study, which included 1.3 million middle-aged women in the UK enrolled between 1996 and 2001. During an average follow-up time of about 10 years, 97 000 cases of cancer were identified.
The risk of total cancer increased with increasing height, as did the risk of many different types of cancer, including cancers of the breast, ovary, womb, bowel, leukaemia and malignant melanoma.
Jane Green, lead author of the study says: "We showed that the link between greater height and increased total cancer risk is similar across many different populations from Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America. The link between height and cancer risk seems to be common to many different types of cancer and in different people; suggesting that there may be a basic common mechanism, perhaps acting early in peoples' lives, when they are growing." *
[/font][/font]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071721/
[font face=Serif]West J Med. 2002 May; 176(3): 206208.
[font size=5]Height, body size, and longevity: is smaller better for the human body?[/font]
[font size=4]FINDINGS SUGGESTING THAT SHORT STATURE IS HEALTHIER[/font]
[font size=3]During the second half of the 20th century, the people living the longest included the Japanese, Hong Kong Chinese, andGreeks2all being shorter and weighing less than northern Europeans and North Americans. In addition, data from the California Department of Health indicate that Asians and Hispanics live more than 4 years longer than taller whites.6 Wild and associates found that East Indians, Chinese, Japanese, and Hispanics in California had lower all-cause and CHD death rates, as shown in the Table.7 Heights obtained from other sources are shown for each ethnic group and indicate that shorter ethnic groups had lower death rates.
Compared with northern Europeans, shorter southern Europeans had substantially lower death rates from CHD and all causes.2 Greeks and Italians in Australia live about 4 years longer than the taller host population, and shorter Turkish migrants in Germany have an age-adjusted CHD death rate half that of taller indigenous Germans. Others have pointed out that genetics is not the primary factor here because after a few generations,Mexican and Japanese migrants approach the CHD and cancer rates of the host country.2 One of us(H E) led medical teams in studies of eight populations selected for healthy and vigorous people and found that they were also small people.8
A report on a 25-year study of Okinawans indicates that they have the greatest longevity in the world, including exceeding that of mainland Japanese.9 Okinawans are vigorous and healthy into advanced ages and continue a high level of physical activity into their 90s. They have the lowest rates of cancer and heart disease in the world and also exceed most countries in centenarians at a rate of 34 per 100,000 versus 5 to 10 per 100,000 for industrialized nations. Bone fractures were found to be substantially less than in mainland Japan and the United States. The Okinawans eat a low-calorie, high-fiber diet rich in vegetables, grains, and soy. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (especially omega 3) are consumed in preference to saturated fats. Refined carbohydrates and animal products, except for fish, are consumed in small amounts. Tea and small amounts of alcohol are drunk daily. However, salt intake is 7 g, which is higher than the less than 1 g consumed by populations with lifelong low blood pressure.
The researchers, Willcox etal,9 did not attribute this superior health to genetics because when younger Okinawans migrate to mainland Japan, Hawaii, or the United States, they soon acquire the chronic diseases of the host population. The Okinawans are shorter and weigh less than mainland Japanese, and men aged 87 to 104 years average 145.4 cm (4ft 9 in) and 42.8 kg (94lb).2
[/font][/font]
[font size=5]Height, body size, and longevity: is smaller better for the human body?[/font]
[font size=4]FINDINGS SUGGESTING THAT SHORT STATURE IS HEALTHIER[/font]
[font size=3]During the second half of the 20th century, the people living the longest included the Japanese, Hong Kong Chinese, andGreeks2all being shorter and weighing less than northern Europeans and North Americans. In addition, data from the California Department of Health indicate that Asians and Hispanics live more than 4 years longer than taller whites.6 Wild and associates found that East Indians, Chinese, Japanese, and Hispanics in California had lower all-cause and CHD death rates, as shown in the Table.7 Heights obtained from other sources are shown for each ethnic group and indicate that shorter ethnic groups had lower death rates.
Compared with northern Europeans, shorter southern Europeans had substantially lower death rates from CHD and all causes.2 Greeks and Italians in Australia live about 4 years longer than the taller host population, and shorter Turkish migrants in Germany have an age-adjusted CHD death rate half that of taller indigenous Germans. Others have pointed out that genetics is not the primary factor here because after a few generations,Mexican and Japanese migrants approach the CHD and cancer rates of the host country.2 One of us(H E) led medical teams in studies of eight populations selected for healthy and vigorous people and found that they were also small people.8
A report on a 25-year study of Okinawans indicates that they have the greatest longevity in the world, including exceeding that of mainland Japanese.9 Okinawans are vigorous and healthy into advanced ages and continue a high level of physical activity into their 90s. They have the lowest rates of cancer and heart disease in the world and also exceed most countries in centenarians at a rate of 34 per 100,000 versus 5 to 10 per 100,000 for industrialized nations. Bone fractures were found to be substantially less than in mainland Japan and the United States. The Okinawans eat a low-calorie, high-fiber diet rich in vegetables, grains, and soy. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (especially omega 3) are consumed in preference to saturated fats. Refined carbohydrates and animal products, except for fish, are consumed in small amounts. Tea and small amounts of alcohol are drunk daily. However, salt intake is 7 g, which is higher than the less than 1 g consumed by populations with lifelong low blood pressure.
The researchers, Willcox etal,9 did not attribute this superior health to genetics because when younger Okinawans migrate to mainland Japan, Hawaii, or the United States, they soon acquire the chronic diseases of the host population. The Okinawans are shorter and weigh less than mainland Japanese, and men aged 87 to 104 years average 145.4 cm (4ft 9 in) and 42.8 kg (94lb).2
[/font][/font]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
174 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
“The modern economy is slavery; it forces everyone to work in such a way their labor is exploited…”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#2
Why do you think people make "poor" choices that make them life-long servants to debt?
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#43
Why? Are we born that way? Are we molded that way to benefit something? Do we "choose" it?
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#47
I think Wesley had the right idea, that it takes training to combat our “natural instincts”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#48
Natural instincts? I don't see hunter-gatherers going into debt, consuming everything in sight
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#49
I completely reject your premise that humans just naturally want material objects
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#51
"Our key error was our choice to see ourselves as being separate from the world that sustains us"
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#114
The level that consumerism requires isn't natural. We are conditioned to it as a matter of policy:
cprise
Dec 2012
#88
“It is a proven fact that health has declined drastically since the onset of agriculture…”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#107
“…only makes sense among a diseased population living with stress and nutritional deficiencies.”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#128
Agriculture as “Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”? – Anthropology 2.1
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#124
I feel like Antrosio just rubbed feces into my cortex while urinating on Diamond's name
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#126
“… shorter stature … agriculture coincided with a massive reduction to human health”
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#145
"A decline of stature of historic populations has been used to indicate nutritional status."
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#146
Interacting with an environment not of your choosing has no impact on the veracity of one's message
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#159
Billions of people are malnourished and a billion face perpetual hunger already
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#168
Almost all the health care advances are merely to negate the consequences of nutritional deficits,
DonCoquixote
Dec 2012
#59
"One of the most profound changes to occur with the foraging to farming transition.....
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#77
the kind of "real" that matters is "stuff happening to me directly" - which is starting too
phantom power
Dec 2012
#3
"'survival of the fittest' does not quite work under these conditions", we THINK.
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2012
#39
This much is certain, we can affect our environment. (We’ve been doing it for millennia.)
OKIsItJustMe
Dec 2012
#15
It seems my skepticism about microfinance was misdirected, but not misplaced
GliderGuider
Dec 2012
#27