Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

In reply to the discussion: Kill the Economy [View all]

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
151. “This is the science. These are the facts.” Uh huh…
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 05:23 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-07/l-hmg071911.php
[font face=Serif]Public release date: 20-Jul-2011

Contact: Dr. Jane Green
arenehan@picr.man.ac.uk
44-018-652-89659
Lancet

[font size=5]Height might give clue to cancer risk[/font]

[font size=3]Taller people are at increased risk of a wide range of cancers, according to an Article published Online First in The Lancet Oncology. In women the risk of cancer rises by about 16% for every 10cm (4 inches) increase in height. Previous studies have shown a link between height and cancer risk, but this research extends the findings to more cancers and for women with differing lifestyles and economic backgrounds. The results suggest that increases in the height of populations over the course of the 20th century might explain some of the changes in cancer incidence over time.

To investigate the impact of height on overall and site-specific cancer risk, Jane Green from the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and colleagues assessed the association between height, other factors relevant for cancer, and cancer incidence in the Million Women Study, which included 1.3 million middle-aged women in the UK enrolled between 1996 and 2001. During an average follow-up time of about 10 years, 97 000 cases of cancer were identified.

The risk of total cancer increased with increasing height, as did the risk of many different types of cancer, including cancers of the breast, ovary, womb, bowel, leukaemia and malignant melanoma.



Jane Green, lead author of the study says: "We showed that the link between greater height and increased total cancer risk is similar across many different populations from Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America. The link between height and cancer risk seems to be common to many different types of cancer and in different people; suggesting that there may be a basic common mechanism, perhaps acting early in peoples' lives, when they are growing." *

…[/font][/font]



http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071721/
[font face=Serif]West J Med. 2002 May; 176(3): 206–208.

[font size=5]Height, body size, and longevity: is smaller better for the human body?[/font]



[font size=4]FINDINGS SUGGESTING THAT SHORT STATURE IS HEALTHIER[/font]

[font size=3]During the second half of the 20th century, the people living the longest included the Japanese, Hong Kong Chinese, andGreeks2—all being shorter and weighing less than northern Europeans and North Americans. In addition, data from the California Department of Health indicate that Asians and Hispanics live more than 4 years longer than taller whites.6 Wild and associates found that East Indians, Chinese, Japanese, and Hispanics in California had lower all-cause and CHD death rates, as shown in the Table.7 Heights obtained from other sources are shown for each ethnic group and indicate that shorter ethnic groups had lower death rates.

Compared with northern Europeans, shorter southern Europeans had substantially lower death rates from CHD and all causes.2 Greeks and Italians in Australia live about 4 years longer than the taller host population, and shorter Turkish migrants in Germany have an age-adjusted CHD death rate half that of taller indigenous Germans. Others have pointed out that genetics is not the primary factor here because after a few generations,Mexican and Japanese migrants approach the CHD and cancer rates of the host country.2 One of us(H E) led medical teams in studies of eight populations selected for healthy and vigorous people and found that they were also small people.8

A report on a 25-year study of Okinawans indicates that they have the greatest longevity in the world, including exceeding that of mainland Japanese.9 Okinawans are vigorous and healthy into advanced ages and continue a high level of physical activity into their 90s. They have the lowest rates of cancer and heart disease in the world and also exceed most countries in centenarians at a rate of 34 per 100,000 versus 5 to 10 per 100,000 for industrialized nations. Bone fractures were found to be substantially less than in mainland Japan and the United States. The Okinawans eat a low-calorie, high-fiber diet rich in vegetables, grains, and soy. Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (especially omega 3) are consumed in preference to saturated fats. Refined carbohydrates and animal products, except for fish, are consumed in small amounts. Tea and small amounts of alcohol are drunk daily. However, salt intake is 7 g, which is higher than the less than 1 g consumed by populations with lifelong low blood pressure.

The researchers, Willcox etal,9 did not attribute this superior health to genetics because when younger Okinawans migrate to mainland Japan, Hawaii, or the United States, they soon acquire the chronic diseases of the host population. The Okinawans are shorter and weigh less than mainland Japanese, and men aged 87 to 104 years average 145.4 cm (4ft 9 in) and 42.8 kg (94lb).2

…[/font][/font]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kill the Economy [View all] Speck Tater Dec 2012 OP
Good riddance NoOneMan Dec 2012 #1
“The modern economy is slavery; it forces everyone to work in such a way their labor is exploited…” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #2
Not a bit NoOneMan Dec 2012 #5
Clearly, you don’t know what “slavery” is… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #6
Forcing you to work to live and exploiting that labor is slavery NoOneMan Dec 2012 #9
That is very clearly framed. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #10
Um… this is BS… seriously OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #12
You know how to free a slave? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #22
You really don’t get it, do you OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #36
Of course a slave wouldn't! NoOneMan Dec 2012 #38
Nonsense OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #42
Why do you think people make "poor" choices that make them life-long servants to debt? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #43
Poor impulse control OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #46
Why? Are we born that way? Are we molded that way to benefit something? Do we "choose" it? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #47
I think Wesley had the right idea, that it takes training to combat our “natural instincts” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #48
Natural instincts? I don't see hunter-gatherers going into debt, consuming everything in sight NoOneMan Dec 2012 #49
I expect hunter-gatherers had similar problems OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #52
Well, what about those around today? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #54
So, tell me… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #57
It is not my home, nor my people NoOneMan Dec 2012 #60
#FirstWorldProblem OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #63
That's a beautiful article about them NoOneMan Dec 2012 #65
The system is designed to push people and governments into debt cprise Dec 2012 #28
Designed by who? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #37
Employers do not need to beat their employees to make them productive NoOneMan Dec 2012 #40
However, to be a slave, one must be owned by someone else OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #44
Almost everything around us is useless and distracting NoOneMan Dec 2012 #45
“… we believe we "need" (because something taught us so)” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #50
I completely reject your premise that humans just naturally want material objects NoOneMan Dec 2012 #51
Can you demonstrate that this desire for possessions is not natural? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #53
Homo Sapiens were on earth long before agriculture and religion NoOneMan Dec 2012 #55
Uh huh… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #56
Whoa, don't let that strawman catch on fire before you are done weaving it! NoOneMan Dec 2012 #58
OK, so how about at a much smaller level? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #61
Its not about hard work NoOneMan Dec 2012 #64
Who programmed the animals? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #66
Satan. He does everything bad. NoOneMan Dec 2012 #67
Interesting… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #85
No, animals do not have a natural, unlearned concept of private ownership NoOneMan Dec 2012 #86
Interesting… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #89
To be blunt, most animals cannot even prove they are self-aware NoOneMan Dec 2012 #92
Re: “To be blunt, most animals cannot even prove they are self-aware” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #94
Self-awareness and emotions are two different things NoOneMan Dec 2012 #95
I don’t believe I said that emotions and self-awareness were the same OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #96
With all due respect, NoOneMan Dec 2012 #97
So, then, you don’t believe that “animals” exhibit “natural behaviors?” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #98
In a human nature vs nurture issue... NoOneMan Dec 2012 #100
I’m sorry OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #101
Culture NoOneMan Dec 2012 #104
Have you read Daniel Quinn? GliderGuider Dec 2012 #108
Yes, and I think it is as viable as a theory as "we all suck" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #110
I don't spend a lot of energy worrying about what is "more natural" GliderGuider Dec 2012 #112
"Our key error was our choice to see ourselves as being separate from the world that sustains us" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #114
The level that consumerism requires isn't natural. We are conditioned to it as a matter of policy: cprise Dec 2012 #88
I will watch it later OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #90
Aside from consumerism, the medical system does this as well NoOneMan Dec 2012 #99
“It is a proven fact that health has declined drastically since the onset of agriculture…” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #107
Universal health care is like democracy. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #109
“In practice it has problems…” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #113
We do have a tendency to perpetually increase complexity to deal with issues NoOneMan Dec 2012 #115
I'm fond of Systemantics OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #125
“…only makes sense among a diseased population living with stress and nutritional deficiencies.” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #128
Well... NoOneMan Dec 2012 #130
"the neolithic farmers survived. The mesolithic hunter-gathers did not" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #111
Agriculture as “Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”? – Anthropology 2.1 OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #124
I feel like Antrosio just rubbed feces into my cortex while urinating on Diamond's name NoOneMan Dec 2012 #126
Did he say the farmers were healthier? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #127
He didn't have room to say much aside from the ad hominems NoOneMan Dec 2012 #129
“The links you posted are of the same study I posted earlier” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #135
My mistake NoOneMan Dec 2012 #141
I don’t go along with that OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #143
There was interbreeding as well NoOneMan Dec 2012 #144
“… shorter stature … agriculture coincided with a massive reduction to human health” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #145
"A decline of stature of historic populations has been used to indicate nutritional status." NoOneMan Dec 2012 #146
Just curious… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #147
I don't know enough about a "Japanese Diet" to answer that NoOneMan Dec 2012 #148
How convenient! OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #149
So they switched some definiciencies for others NoOneMan Dec 2012 #150
“This is the science. These are the facts.” Uh huh… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #151
Quick, send that link to the paleopathologists! NoOneMan Dec 2012 #152
This message was self-deleted by its author OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #153
Height, health, and development OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #154
Did it every occur to you that they are both correct? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #157
My key point is this OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #164
I think this is where we aren't seeing eye to eye NoOneMan Dec 2012 #165
Coevolution tama Dec 2012 #133
It is an interesting viewpoint OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #137
This has echoes of Dawkins' "Selfish Gene" hypothesis GliderGuider Dec 2012 #139
Its clear humans do those things for other species NoOneMan Dec 2012 #142
"Anthropomorphic selfish gene game theory..." tama Dec 2012 #170
Interesting idea NoOneMan Dec 2012 #171
As Socrates said: tama Dec 2012 #174
Yup. Thusly the term slave wages, FogerRox Dec 2012 #68
Well, it is safe to say you have never worked a farm AlexSatan Dec 2012 #155
I grew up on an organic farm NoOneMan Dec 2012 #158
your solution is simple backwoodsbob Dec 2012 #79
Are the 40 acres free? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #80
Thank you for making my point DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #103
Really? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #105
actually no DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #117
Agroforestry NoOneMan Dec 2012 #119
OK DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #120
There is a large variety of techniques & approaches NoOneMan Dec 2012 #122
Wow. Breathing air (necessary for life)==being on the Internet AlexSatan Dec 2012 #156
Interacting with an environment not of your choosing has no impact on the veracity of one's message NoOneMan Dec 2012 #159
You might want to look up "ad hominem attack" AlexSatan Dec 2012 #160
Yes, attacking me instead of what I am saying NoOneMan Dec 2012 #161
I mocked THE COMPARISON you made AlexSatan Dec 2012 #162
"It is just hypocritical to use a system you want to destroy" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #163
of course DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #167
Billions of people are malnourished and a billion face perpetual hunger already NoOneMan Dec 2012 #168
"You are a butthole" == ad hominem attack AlexSatan Dec 2012 #172
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque NoOneMan Dec 2012 #173
So you compare surgery and dentistry DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #166
I'm not sure where you are getting this comparison NoOneMan Dec 2012 #169
Almost all the health care advances are merely to negate the consequences of nutritional deficits, DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #59
"The emergence of agriculture may have exacerbated the dilemma..." NoOneMan Dec 2012 #62
hahahahaha DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #69
Rawest end of the forceps you mean? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #70
a few hundred years? DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #71
You want to talk about facts, but you ignore or laugh at: NoOneMan Dec 2012 #72
do provide some PROOF of point one DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #73
Head back to the "hahahaha" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #74
so DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #75
Academic studies cannot defeat civilization dogma NoOneMan Dec 2012 #76
Ummm... 2naSalit Dec 2012 #78
Higher mortality rates could be construed as such NoOneMan Dec 2012 #81
"One of the most profound changes to occur with the foraging to farming transition..... NoOneMan Dec 2012 #77
You forget one thing DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #102
Primitive medicine isn't blind intuition NoOneMan Dec 2012 #106
Without science, it is DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #116
Blind intuition or not, its really irrelevant outside of a specific context NoOneMan Dec 2012 #118
not quite DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #121
Let's please not do the dying in childbirth thing again NoOneMan Dec 2012 #123
the kind of "real" that matters is "stuff happening to me directly" - which is starting too phantom power Dec 2012 #3
Kill the economy and everyone lives happily ever after... hunter Dec 2012 #4
Socialism demands that you work for the "common good" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #8
Not much point raging against the Fates or the Furies. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #7
I couldn't agree more. Speck Tater Dec 2012 #11
And I disagree... 'survival of the fittest' cprise Dec 2012 #29
Well in that case I guess we have to pin our hopes on some alien life form Speck Tater Dec 2012 #30
You must be a blast at parties. n/t cprise Dec 2012 #31
I don't know. I never get invited! :-) nt Speck Tater Dec 2012 #32
That makes perfect sense. n/t cprise Dec 2012 #33
"'survival of the fittest' does not quite work under these conditions", we THINK. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #39
You're in E/E now... the context is ecology cprise Dec 2012 #91
You made an assertion. AtheistCrusader Dec 2012 #93
“Let's see what comes next.” OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #13
That's a fundamental difference between us. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #14
This much is certain, we can affect our environment. (We’ve been doing it for millennia.) OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #15
"Can we really make them all that much worse at this point?" GliderGuider Dec 2012 #16
Which blind efforts are we actively making to improve our lot? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #17
Well, let's take micro-loans. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #18
OK, let’s see… OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #19
I'll admit that my micro-loan example was a bit mischievous GliderGuider Dec 2012 #21
Certain annual hay plants tama Dec 2012 #134
First example doesn't work Iterate Dec 2012 #20
Yes on all counts, but another question comes up. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #23
It seems my skepticism about microfinance was misdirected, but not misplaced GliderGuider Dec 2012 #27
We can also tama Dec 2012 #82
Well, yes OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #84
Problem with science tama Dec 2012 #132
Sorry, I can’t see the word “objectivism” without thinking of Ayn Rand OKIsItJustMe Dec 2012 #140
There is no Sorcerer, there is just us. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #138
In addition, the system thrives on conflict NoOneMan Dec 2012 #24
Yes, "fighting the system" requires one to be part of it. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #26
GliderGuider, tama Dec 2012 #83
Mind your manners, young whippersnapper. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #87
middle age - been there, done that tama Dec 2012 #131
What a great comeback! GliderGuider Dec 2012 #136
Have you ever considered, NoOneMan Dec 2012 #25
Is this adressed specifically to GliderGuider? cprise Dec 2012 #34
Response to "I prefer to guide what comes next." NoOneMan Dec 2012 #35
No, not to me - but I agree with it completely. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Kill the Economy»Reply #151